TY - JOUR
T1 - Facility-level analysis of robot utilization across disciplines in the National Cancer Database
AU - Fantus, Richard J.
AU - Cohen, Andrew
AU - Riedinger, Christopher B.
AU - Kuchta, Kristine
AU - Wang, Chi H.
AU - Yao, Katharine
AU - Park, Sangtae
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/4/5
Y1 - 2019/4/5
N2 - To evaluate trends in contemporary robotic surgery across multiple organ sites as they relate to robotic prostatectomy volume. We queried the National Cancer Database for patients who underwent surgery from 2010 to 2013 for prostate, kidney, bladder, corpus uteri, uterus, cervix, colon, sigmoid, rectum, lung and bronchus. The trend between volumes of robotic surgery for each organ site was analyzed using the Cochran–Armitage test. Multivariable models were then created to determine independent predictors of robotic surgery within each organ site by calculating the odds ratio with 95% CI. Among the 566,399 surgical cases analyzed, 35.1% were performed using robot assistance. Institutions whose robotic prostatectomy volume was in the top 75 percentile compared to the bottom 25 percentile performed a larger percentage of robotic surgery on the following sites: kidney 32.6 vs. 28.8%, bladder 23.6 vs. 18.6%, uterus 52.5 vs. 47.7%, cervix 43.5 vs. 39.2%, colon 3.2 vs. 2.9%, rectum 10.7 vs. 8.9%, and lung 7.3 vs. 6.8% (all p < 0.0001). It appears that increased trends toward robotic surgery in urology have lead to increased robotic utilization within other surgical fields. Future analysis in benign utilizations of robotic surgery as well as outcome data comparing robotic to open approaches are needed to better understand the ever-evolving nature of minimally invasive surgery within the United States.
AB - To evaluate trends in contemporary robotic surgery across multiple organ sites as they relate to robotic prostatectomy volume. We queried the National Cancer Database for patients who underwent surgery from 2010 to 2013 for prostate, kidney, bladder, corpus uteri, uterus, cervix, colon, sigmoid, rectum, lung and bronchus. The trend between volumes of robotic surgery for each organ site was analyzed using the Cochran–Armitage test. Multivariable models were then created to determine independent predictors of robotic surgery within each organ site by calculating the odds ratio with 95% CI. Among the 566,399 surgical cases analyzed, 35.1% were performed using robot assistance. Institutions whose robotic prostatectomy volume was in the top 75 percentile compared to the bottom 25 percentile performed a larger percentage of robotic surgery on the following sites: kidney 32.6 vs. 28.8%, bladder 23.6 vs. 18.6%, uterus 52.5 vs. 47.7%, cervix 43.5 vs. 39.2%, colon 3.2 vs. 2.9%, rectum 10.7 vs. 8.9%, and lung 7.3 vs. 6.8% (all p < 0.0001). It appears that increased trends toward robotic surgery in urology have lead to increased robotic utilization within other surgical fields. Future analysis in benign utilizations of robotic surgery as well as outcome data comparing robotic to open approaches are needed to better understand the ever-evolving nature of minimally invasive surgery within the United States.
KW - Da Vinci
KW - Healthcare trends
KW - Minimally invasive surgery
KW - Prostatectomy
KW - Robotics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051130998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051130998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11701-018-0855-9
DO - 10.1007/s11701-018-0855-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 30062641
AN - SCOPUS:85051130998
SN - 1863-2483
VL - 13
SP - 293
EP - 299
JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery
JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery
IS - 2
ER -