Exploration of radiographically normal total knee replacements for unexplained pain

Michael A. Mont, Fred K. Serna, Kenneth A. Krackow, David S. Hungerford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

83 Scopus citations

Abstract

Twenty-seven patients underwent exploration of their total knee replacements because of severe debilitating pain of an unknown cause. The group was further subdivided into (1) patients who had painful knees with range of motion greater than 80° and (2) patients who had painful knees with decreased range of motion (< 80° arc). At final followup, there were 11 excellent and good results (41%) with 16 fair or poor results (59%). For the 15 patients with decreased range of motion, 9 of 15 knees (60%) had good or excellent results. Range of motion are improved from a preoperative 43° average to a 81° average. For the pain only group, there were only 2 excellent or good results (17%). Poor results were encountered in 6 of 7 patients (86%) in whom a cementless prosthesis was converted to a cemented prosthesis. If a problem was identified at surgery, only 3 of 12 knees (25%) had successful outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-220
Number of pages5
JournalClinical orthopaedics and related research
Volume331
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploration of radiographically normal total knee replacements for unexplained pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this