TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the evaluation of potentially malignant disorders in the oral cavity
T2 - A report of the American Dental Association
AU - Lingen, Mark W.
AU - Abt, Elliot
AU - Agrawal, Nishant
AU - Chaturvedi, Anil K.
AU - Cohen, Ezra
AU - D'Souza, Gypsyamber
AU - Gurenlian, Jo Ann
AU - Kalmar, John R.
AU - Kerr, Alexander R.
AU - Lambert, Paul M.
AU - Patton, Lauren L.
AU - Sollecito, Thomas P.
AU - Truelove, Edmond
AU - Tampi, Malavika P.
AU - Urquhart, Olivia
AU - Banfield, Laura
AU - Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosures. Dr. Lingen has received research funding from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). In addition, he is the editor-in-chief of Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and the vice president of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Dr. Agrawal has received funds from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct research focused on head and neck cancer genetics and tumor DNA in the saliva and plasma of patients with head and neck cancer. He is also on the editorial board of Scientific Reports . Dr. Chaturvedi has received funds from the Intramural Program of the NCI to conduct research focused on the natural history of oral cancer precursor lesions. He is an employee at the NCI NIH, and authorship in this guideline is considered his opinion and not that of the NCI NIH. Dr. Cohen is a consultant to AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Human Longevity, Merck, Merck Serono, and Pfizer. Dr. D’Souza has received funds from the NIDCR. Dr. Kalmar has received funds from The Ohio State University to conduct research on determining surgical margins by using VELscope (LED Medical Diagnostics). Dr. Kerr has received funds from the NIDCR to conduct research focused on increasing oral cancer screening by dentists. Dr. Patton is a coeditor of the second edition of The ADA Practical Guide to Patients With Medical Conditions . She also has received funds from the NIDCR to conduct research focused on a clinical registry of dental outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer. In addition, she is the oral medicine section editor of Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology , and she is vice president of the American Academy of Oral Medicine. Dr. Sollecito is the director and treasurer of the American Board of Oral Medicine, a site visitor for the Commission on Dental Accreditation, and a regional director for the Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh. He also has received funds from the NIDCR to conduct research focused on a clinical registry of dental outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer. Ms. Tampi, Mrs. Urquhart, and Dr. Carrasco-Labra have no disclosures to report.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Dental Association
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Background An expert panel convened by the American Dental Association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs and the Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry conducted a systematic review and formulated clinical recommendations to inform primary care clinicians about the potential use of adjuncts as triage tools for the evaluation of lesions, including potentially malignant disorders (PMDs), in the oral cavity. Types of Studies Reviewed This is an update of the ADA's 2010 recommendations on the early diagnosis of PMDs and oral squamous cell carcinoma. The authors conducted a systematic search of the literature in MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials and diagnostic test accuracy studies. The authors used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty in the evidence and to move from the evidence to the decisions. Results The panel formulated 1 good practice statement and 6 clinical recommendations that concluded that no available adjuncts demonstrated sufficient diagnostic test accuracy to support their routine use as triage tools during the evaluation of lesions in the oral cavity. For patients seeking care for suspicious lesions, immediate performance of a biopsy or referral to a specialist remains the single most important recommendation for clinical practice. In exceptional cases, when patients decline a biopsy or live in rural areas with limited access to care, the panel suggested that cytologic testing may be used to initiate the diagnostic process until a biopsy can be performed (conditional recommendation, low-quality evidence). Conclusions and Practical Implications The authors urge clinicians to remain alert and take diligent action when they identify a PMD. The authors emphasize the need for counseling because patients may delay diagnosis because of anxiety and denial.
AB - Background An expert panel convened by the American Dental Association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs and the Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry conducted a systematic review and formulated clinical recommendations to inform primary care clinicians about the potential use of adjuncts as triage tools for the evaluation of lesions, including potentially malignant disorders (PMDs), in the oral cavity. Types of Studies Reviewed This is an update of the ADA's 2010 recommendations on the early diagnosis of PMDs and oral squamous cell carcinoma. The authors conducted a systematic search of the literature in MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials and diagnostic test accuracy studies. The authors used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty in the evidence and to move from the evidence to the decisions. Results The panel formulated 1 good practice statement and 6 clinical recommendations that concluded that no available adjuncts demonstrated sufficient diagnostic test accuracy to support their routine use as triage tools during the evaluation of lesions in the oral cavity. For patients seeking care for suspicious lesions, immediate performance of a biopsy or referral to a specialist remains the single most important recommendation for clinical practice. In exceptional cases, when patients decline a biopsy or live in rural areas with limited access to care, the panel suggested that cytologic testing may be used to initiate the diagnostic process until a biopsy can be performed (conditional recommendation, low-quality evidence). Conclusions and Practical Implications The authors urge clinicians to remain alert and take diligent action when they identify a PMD. The authors emphasize the need for counseling because patients may delay diagnosis because of anxiety and denial.
KW - American Dental Association
KW - clinical recommendations
KW - diagnostic test accuracy
KW - oral squamous cell carcinoma
KW - potentially malignant disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032002620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032002620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.07.032
DO - 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.07.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 28958308
AN - SCOPUS:85032002620
SN - 0002-8177
VL - 148
SP - 712-727.e10
JO - Journal of the American Dental Association
JF - Journal of the American Dental Association
IS - 10
ER -