Evaluation of self-collected cervicovaginal cell samples for human papillomavirus testing by polymerase chain reaction

Patti E. Gravitt, James V. Lacey, Louise A. Brinton, Willard A. Barnes, Janet R. Kornegay, Mitchell D. Greenberg, Sarah M. Greene, Olympia C. Hadjimichael, Larry McGowan, Rodrique Mortel, Peter E. Schwartz, Richard Zaino, Allan Hildesheim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

123 Scopus citations


As human papillomavirus (HPV) becomes accepted as the central cause of cervical cancer, longitudinal studies are shifting focus away from causality to a more detailed investigation of the natural history of HPV infections. These studies commonly require repeated samples for HPV testing over several years, usually collected during a pelvic exam, which is inconvenient to the participants and costly to the study. To alleviate the inconvenience and cost of repeated clinic visits, it has been proposed that women collect cervicovaginal cells themselves, hopefully increasing participation in the natural history studies. We evaluated the technical feasibility of self-collection of cervicovaginal cells using a Dacron swab for HPV DNA detection. We compared the self-collected swab sample and two clinician-administered swab samples (one from the endocervix and another from the ectocervix) from a total of 268 women participating in a case-control study of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix (111 cases and 157 controls). HPV DNA was detected and genotyped using an L1 consensus PCR assay. The overall agreement between the clinician- and self-collected swabs was excellent [88.1%; κ = 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.85)]. The correlation was highest between the two clinician-administered swabs [κ = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93)] but was still excellent when comparing either clinician-administered swab to the self-administered sample [κ = 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.87) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.79) for ectocervix and endocervix, respectively]. The type-specific agreement between samples was higher for high-risk, or cancer-associated, HPV genotypes than for low risk, noncancer-associated HPV genotypes when comparing the self-administered swab sample to the clinician-administered swab sample (κ = 0.78 for high-risk versus 0.66 for low-risk HPV infections, t = -1.45, P = 0.15). The decrease in agreement for low risk types was largely attributable to an increased detection of these types in the self-administered sample (McNemar's X2 = 6.25, P = 0.01 for clinician- versus self-administered swab comparisons). The agreement did not vary significantly by age, menopausal status, case status, or clinic center. We have demonstrated that a self-collected Dacron swab sample of cervicovaginal cells is a technically feasible alternative to clinician-administered cervical cell collection in natural history studies of HPV and cervical cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-100
Number of pages6
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of self-collected cervicovaginal cell samples for human papillomavirus testing by polymerase chain reaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this