TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of airborne asbestos concentrations using tem and sem during residential water tank removal
AU - Breysse, P. N.
AU - Cherrie, J. W.
AU - Addison, J.
AU - Dodgson, J.
PY - 1989
Y1 - 1989
N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate three different analytical techniques for estimating concentrations of airborne asbestos during a short-term removal operation. Samples were collected during the removal of asbestos-insulated water tanks. The tank insulation consisted of chrysotile mixed with glass fibre and cellulose. The short time-span, less than 40 min, combined with low level of release of asbestos fibre expected, made the operation difficult to evaluate. The large air samples needed for adequate quantitative assessment were collected using high flowrates for short periods. Airborne samples were collected for phase contrast optical, and scanning and transmission electron, microscopic (PCOM, SEM and TEM) analysis, using direct transfer techniques.Membrane filter samples collected for PCOM analysis were rejected because of excessive particle loading. The mean chrysotile asbestos fibre concentrations determined, by the European Reference Method (ERM) of fibre counting, and using SEM at 10 000 x and TEM at 2200 x, were 0.12 and 0.11 f ml-1, respectively. A comparison of side-by-side samples suggested that TEM analysis might be indistinguishable from SEM for ERM fibre counting. The results indicated, however, that when total asbestos fibres were counted TEM analysis provided consistently greater estimates of concentrations of airborne fibres.
AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate three different analytical techniques for estimating concentrations of airborne asbestos during a short-term removal operation. Samples were collected during the removal of asbestos-insulated water tanks. The tank insulation consisted of chrysotile mixed with glass fibre and cellulose. The short time-span, less than 40 min, combined with low level of release of asbestos fibre expected, made the operation difficult to evaluate. The large air samples needed for adequate quantitative assessment were collected using high flowrates for short periods. Airborne samples were collected for phase contrast optical, and scanning and transmission electron, microscopic (PCOM, SEM and TEM) analysis, using direct transfer techniques.Membrane filter samples collected for PCOM analysis were rejected because of excessive particle loading. The mean chrysotile asbestos fibre concentrations determined, by the European Reference Method (ERM) of fibre counting, and using SEM at 10 000 x and TEM at 2200 x, were 0.12 and 0.11 f ml-1, respectively. A comparison of side-by-side samples suggested that TEM analysis might be indistinguishable from SEM for ERM fibre counting. The results indicated, however, that when total asbestos fibres were counted TEM analysis provided consistently greater estimates of concentrations of airborne fibres.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024361692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024361692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/annhyg/33.2.243
DO - 10.1093/annhyg/33.2.243
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0024361692
SN - 0003-4878
VL - 33
SP - 243
EP - 256
JO - Annals of Occupational Hygiene
JF - Annals of Occupational Hygiene
IS - 2
ER -