Evaluating the impact of multicancer early detection testing on health and economic outcomes: Toward a decision modeling strategy

Joseph Lipscomb, Susan Horton, Albert Kuo, Cristian Tomasetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Emerging data provide initial support for the concept that a single, minimally invasive liquid biopsy test, performed in conjunction with confirmatory radiologic or other diagnostic testing, when indicated, could be deployed on a broad scale to screen individuals for multiple types of cancer. Ideally, such a test could do this in a way that yields a clinically important percentage of true-positive indications of cancer while minimizing false-positive signals. Modern decision modeling approaches can and should be deployed to investigate the health and economic consequences of such multicancer early detection (MCED) testing within defined at-risk populations. In this paper, through small-scale analyses involving 3 hypothetical MCED-detectible cancers, the authors illustrate the potential for MCED testing to be cost-effective, along with the pivotal role of test-induced stage shift on results. The time is ripe for additional, prospective investigations of the clinical value of MCED testing, the benefits versus the risks for screened populations, and the overall projected impact on health outcomes and costs over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)892-908
Number of pages17
JournalCancer
Volume128
Issue numberS4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2022

Keywords

  • cost-benefit analysis
  • decision support techniques
  • early detection of cancer/economics
  • health care costs
  • mass screening/economics
  • quality-adjusted life-years

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the impact of multicancer early detection testing on health and economic outcomes: Toward a decision modeling strategy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this