TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating Perceived Emergency Preparedness and Household Preparedness Behaviors
T2 - Results from a CASPER Survey in Fairfax, Virginia
AU - Ferguson, Rennie W.
AU - Kiernan, Shawn
AU - Spannhake, Ernst W.
AU - Schwartz, Benjamin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc..
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objectives: Using data collected from a Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) conducted in Fairfax Health District, Virginia, in 2016, we sought to assess the relationship between household-level perceived preparedness and self-reported preparedness behaviors.Methods: Weighted population estimates and 95% confidence intervals were reported, and Pearson's chi-squared test was used to investigate differences by group.Results: Examining responses to how prepared respondents felt their household was to handle a large-scale emergency or disaster, an estimated 7.4% of respondents (95% CI: 4.3-12.3) reported that their household was completely prepared, 37.3% (95% CI: 31.4-43.7) were moderately prepared, 38.2% (95% CI: 31.6-45.2) were somewhat prepared, and 14.4% (95% CI: 10.2-20.0) were unprepared. A greater proportion of respondents who said that their household was completely or moderately prepared for an emergency reported engaging in several behaviors related to preparedness. However, for several preparedness behaviors, there were gaps between perceived preparedness and self-reported readiness.Conclusions: Community assessments for public health preparedness can provide valuable data about groups who may be at risk during an emergency due to a lack of planning and practice, despite feeling prepared to handle a large-scale emergency or disaster.
AB - Objectives: Using data collected from a Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) conducted in Fairfax Health District, Virginia, in 2016, we sought to assess the relationship between household-level perceived preparedness and self-reported preparedness behaviors.Methods: Weighted population estimates and 95% confidence intervals were reported, and Pearson's chi-squared test was used to investigate differences by group.Results: Examining responses to how prepared respondents felt their household was to handle a large-scale emergency or disaster, an estimated 7.4% of respondents (95% CI: 4.3-12.3) reported that their household was completely prepared, 37.3% (95% CI: 31.4-43.7) were moderately prepared, 38.2% (95% CI: 31.6-45.2) were somewhat prepared, and 14.4% (95% CI: 10.2-20.0) were unprepared. A greater proportion of respondents who said that their household was completely or moderately prepared for an emergency reported engaging in several behaviors related to preparedness. However, for several preparedness behaviors, there were gaps between perceived preparedness and self-reported readiness.Conclusions: Community assessments for public health preparedness can provide valuable data about groups who may be at risk during an emergency due to a lack of planning and practice, despite feeling prepared to handle a large-scale emergency or disaster.
KW - CASPER
KW - community assessment
KW - emergency preparedness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069766410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069766410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/dmp.2019.48
DO - 10.1017/dmp.2019.48
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31331403
AN - SCOPUS:85069766410
SN - 1935-7893
VL - 14
SP - 222
EP - 228
JO - Disaster medicine and public health preparedness
JF - Disaster medicine and public health preparedness
IS - 2
ER -