TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating home environments of persons with dementia
T2 - Interrater reliability and validity of the Home Environmental Assessment Protocol (HEAP)
AU - Gitlin, L. N.
AU - Schinfeld, S.
AU - Winter, L.
AU - Corcoran, M.
AU - Boyce, A. A.
AU - Hauck, W.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors grallytackenowledfuge the contributonis of rtarse, Jean Mchemera, MGS, Amea lHenin, iMAn, Stepghen Kern, OT/L anRd Geri Shaw, OTR/L. Apprecinais alsto iextondeed to the caersregiv who allowed their homes to be obseredv. The stduy was suppodrby te the National Institute on Ageing (Grant # R0-3GA5751and 1Gnt #ra U0-A1G13265). A version of this paper was presented at the Gerontologiacl Society of AmearMitci,en1eNg8sbo, 2ev0r,0e0m WsinhgtanoDC, USA.
PY - 2002/1/10
Y1 - 2002/1/10
N2 - Purpose: This article reports on an interrater reliability and preliminary validity study of an investigator-developed tool, the Home Environmental Assessment Protocol (HEAP) for use in homes of persons with dementia. Method: The HEAP consists of 192 items that are summed into separate indices representing the number of hazards, adaptations, and level of clutter and comfort in eight areas of the home. Interrater reliability was examined among four raters, two environmental experts and two non-experts, who observed 22 dementia households. Results: The Kappa statistic was used to evaluate agreement level for each measured item and found that agreement ranged from slight to almost perfect. Intraclass correlations (ICCs), were used to evaluate agreement level for indices. The hazard index in each room ranged from fair (0.36) to moderate (0.66) for all raters. For the adaptation, clutter and comfort indices in each room, ICCs ranged from 0.51 to 0.90 for all raters. Agreement level between expert and non-expert raters differed minimally for all indices. Adaptations to dining rooms (r=-0.080, p=0.001), kitchens (r=-0.52, p=0.02) and bedrooms (r=-0.76, p=0.001) were associated with patient deficits such that more adaptations were made in homes of dependent persons. Low Mini-Mental Status Examination scores were associated with fewer hazards, more adaptations, and less clutter. Conclusion: Findings show that both experts and non-expert raters use the HEAP consistently. Also, measured attributes are related to cognitive and functional status in the expected direction.
AB - Purpose: This article reports on an interrater reliability and preliminary validity study of an investigator-developed tool, the Home Environmental Assessment Protocol (HEAP) for use in homes of persons with dementia. Method: The HEAP consists of 192 items that are summed into separate indices representing the number of hazards, adaptations, and level of clutter and comfort in eight areas of the home. Interrater reliability was examined among four raters, two environmental experts and two non-experts, who observed 22 dementia households. Results: The Kappa statistic was used to evaluate agreement level for each measured item and found that agreement ranged from slight to almost perfect. Intraclass correlations (ICCs), were used to evaluate agreement level for indices. The hazard index in each room ranged from fair (0.36) to moderate (0.66) for all raters. For the adaptation, clutter and comfort indices in each room, ICCs ranged from 0.51 to 0.90 for all raters. Agreement level between expert and non-expert raters differed minimally for all indices. Adaptations to dining rooms (r=-0.080, p=0.001), kitchens (r=-0.52, p=0.02) and bedrooms (r=-0.76, p=0.001) were associated with patient deficits such that more adaptations were made in homes of dependent persons. Low Mini-Mental Status Examination scores were associated with fewer hazards, more adaptations, and less clutter. Conclusion: Findings show that both experts and non-expert raters use the HEAP consistently. Also, measured attributes are related to cognitive and functional status in the expected direction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037050243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037050243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09638280110066325
DO - 10.1080/09638280110066325
M3 - Article
C2 - 11827156
AN - SCOPUS:0037050243
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 24
SP - 59
EP - 71
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 1-3
ER -