Establish a comprehensive plan robustness evaluation platform for intensity modulated proton therapy for bilateral head and neck cancer based on the daily cone-beam computed tomography: a dose accumulation study between the PTV based IMPT (PTV-IMPT) and CTV based robust optimized IMPT (ro-IMPT) planning strategies

Wei Gang Wang, An Qin, Xiaoqiang Li, Jun Zhou, Di Yan, Gang Liu, Lewei Zhao, Yuenan Wang, Rohan Deraniyagala, Inga Grills, Craig Stevens, Daniel Krauss, Xuanfeng Ding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: A comprehensive plan evaluation platform was established based on the daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assess the treatment robustness quality between planning target volume-based intensity modulated proton therapy (PTV-IMPT) and clinical target volume (CTV)-based robust optimized IMPT (ro-IMPT) planning strategies in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. Methods: Nine bilateral HNC patients' CT structure sets were used in this study. Daily CBCTs were converted into synthetic-CT (sCT) for dose reconstruction. The accuracy of the proton dose calculation in sCT is cross-validated via the same day's verification-CT sim (vCT) with 3D gamma index comparison. PTV-IMPT and ro-IMPT were generated on the initial planning CT (pCT). CTV high-risk volume (CTV_high) received 70 Gy and CTV low/intermediate-risk (CTV_low) received 60 Gy. For PTV-IMPT, the PTVs were expanded 3 mm from the CTV; for ro-IMPT, robust optimization used a 3 mm setup and 3.5% range uncertainties. Dose accumulations were then calculated on the 35 sets of daily sCT, and the target coverages were compared to the initial plans. Results: The 3D gamma index dose comparison (3 mm/3%) showed an average pass rate of 98.2%±1.5% comparing the same day's pair of sCT and vCT with both plans (total 38 pairs). Through the dose accumulation of 35 treatment fractions, the PTV-IMPT plan group's mean V100 of CTV_high/CTV_low coverage degraded to 80.70%/85.73% compared to 96.72%/96.13% of the ro-IMPT group (P<0.002). One patient did have suboptimal coverage (CTV_low <90%) even with ro-IMPT. Significant weight loss was noted for this patient during the treatment course (>5 lbs). Conclusions: A comprehensive plan robustness evaluation platform based on the CBCT is established in our clinical workflow and enables dose accumulation and plan robustness evaluation on a daily basis. ro-IMPT demonstrated an optimal planning strategy over PTV-IMPT for bilateral HNC treatment. However, special cautions are needed for patients with significant weight or geometry changes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number9
JournalTherapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • dose accumulation
  • head and neck cancer (HNC)
  • Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT)
  • robustness optimization
  • synthetic-CT (sCT)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Oncology(nursing)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Establish a comprehensive plan robustness evaluation platform for intensity modulated proton therapy for bilateral head and neck cancer based on the daily cone-beam computed tomography: a dose accumulation study between the PTV based IMPT (PTV-IMPT) and CTV based robust optimized IMPT (ro-IMPT) planning strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this