Erratum to "Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables" [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:638-646] (DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008)

N. Sourial; C. Wolfson; B. Zhu; J. Quail; J. Fletcher; S. Karunananthan; K. Bandeen-Roche; F. Béland; H. Bergman

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.003

Erratum to "Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables" [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:638-646] (DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008)

N. Sourial, C. Wolfson, B. Zhu, J. Quail, J. Fletcher, S. Karunananthan, K. Bandeen-Roche, F. Béland, H. Bergman

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	809
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume	63
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.003
State	Published - Jul 2010
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Epidemiology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.003

Cite this

Sourial, N., Wolfson, C., Zhu, B., Quail, J., Fletcher, J., Karunananthan, S., Bandeen-Roche, K., Béland, F., & Bergman, H. (2010). Erratum to "Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables" [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:638-646] (DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.003

Erratum to "Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables" [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:638-646] (DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008). / Sourial, N.; Wolfson, C.; Zhu, B. et al.
In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 63, No. 7, 07.2010, p. 809.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Sourial, N, Wolfson, C, Zhu, B, Quail, J, Fletcher, J, Karunananthan, S, Bandeen-Roche, K, Béland, F & Bergman, H 2010, 'Erratum to "Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables" [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:638-646] (DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008)', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.003

@article{da226de462dc4fd6aeca88d1b5589063,

title = "Erratum to {"}Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables{"} [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:638-646] (DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008)",

author = "N. Sourial and C. Wolfson and B. Zhu and J. Quail and J. Fletcher and S. Karunananthan and K. Bandeen-Roche and F. B{\'e}land and H. Bergman",

year = "2010",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.003",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "63",

pages = "809",

journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",

issn = "0895-4356",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum to "Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables" [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:638-646] (DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008)

AU - Sourial, N.

AU - Wolfson, C.

AU - Zhu, B.

AU - Quail, J.

AU - Fletcher, J.

AU - Karunananthan, S.

AU - Bandeen-Roche, K.

AU - Béland, F.

AU - Bergman, H.

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952428004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952428004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.003

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:77952428004

SN - 0895-4356

VL - 63

SP - 809

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

IS - 7

ER -

Erratum to "Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables" [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:638-646] (DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this