Erratum: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The "big Three" - Vascular events, infections, and cancers (Diagnosis 6: 3 (227-240) (DOI: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019)

David E. Newman-Toker; Adam C. Schaffer; C. Winnie Yu-Moe; Najlla Nassery; Ali S. Saber Tehrani; Gwendolyn D. Clemens; Zheyu Wang; Yuxin Zhu; Mehdi Fanai; Dana Siegal

doi:10.1515/dx-2020-0034

Erratum: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The "big Three" - Vascular events, infections, and cancers (Diagnosis 6: 3 (227-240) (DOI: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019)

David E. Newman-Toker, Adam C. Schaffer, C. Winnie Yu-Moe, Najlla Nassery, Ali S. Saber Tehrani, Gwendolyn D. Clemens, Zheyu Wang, Yuxin Zhu, Mehdi Fanai, Dana Siegal

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In Table 3 of the original manuscript, the “Big Three % of High Severity” from “Non-claims sources” (final column) was incorrect. Instead of “76.8% (n = 159/207)” (incorrect), it should have read “75.8% (n = 157/207)” (correct).

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	127-128
Number of pages	2
Journal	Diagnosis
Volume	8
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0034
State	Published - Feb 1 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

Access to Document

10.1515/dx-2020-0034

Cite this

Newman-Toker, D. E., Schaffer, A. C., Yu-Moe, C. W., Nassery, N., Saber Tehrani, A. S., Clemens, G. D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Fanai, M., & Siegal, D. (2021). Erratum: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The "big Three" - Vascular events, infections, and cancers (Diagnosis 6: 3 (227-240) (DOI: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019). Diagnosis, 8(1), 127-128. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0034

Erratum: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The "big Three" - Vascular events, infections, and cancers (Diagnosis 6: 3 (227-240) (DOI: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019). / Newman-Toker, David E.; Schaffer, Adam C.; Yu-Moe, C. Winnie et al.
In: Diagnosis, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.02.2021, p. 127-128.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Newman-Toker, DE, Schaffer, AC, Yu-Moe, CW, Nassery, N, Saber Tehrani, AS , Clemens, GD , Wang, Z , Zhu, Y, Fanai, M & Siegal, D 2021, 'Erratum: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The "big Three" - Vascular events, infections, and cancers (Diagnosis 6: 3 (227-240) (DOI: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019)', Diagnosis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 127-128. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0034

@article{f619d39d7f304ad68ad737eae447d3f0,

title = "Erratum: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The {"}big Three{"} - Vascular events, infections, and cancers (Diagnosis 6: 3 (227-240) (DOI: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019)",

abstract = "In Table 3 of the original manuscript, the “Big Three % of High Severity” from “Non-claims sources” (final column) was incorrect. Instead of “76.8% (n = 159/207)” (incorrect), it should have read “75.8% (n = 157/207)” (correct).",

author = "Newman-Toker, {David E.} and Schaffer, {Adam C.} and Yu-Moe, {C. Winnie} and Najlla Nassery and {Saber Tehrani}, {Ali S.} and Clemens, {Gwendolyn D.} and Zheyu Wang and Yuxin Zhu and Mehdi Fanai and Dana Siegal",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1515/dx-2020-0034",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "8",

pages = "127--128",

journal = "Diagnosis",

issn = "2194-8011",

publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The "big Three" - Vascular events, infections, and cancers (Diagnosis 6: 3 (227-240) (DOI: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019)

AU - Newman-Toker, David E.

AU - Schaffer, Adam C.

AU - Yu-Moe, C. Winnie

AU - Nassery, Najlla

AU - Saber Tehrani, Ali S.

AU - Clemens, Gwendolyn D.

AU - Wang, Zheyu

AU - Zhu, Yuxin

AU - Fanai, Mehdi

AU - Siegal, Dana

PY - 2021/2/1

Y1 - 2021/2/1

N2 - In Table 3 of the original manuscript, the “Big Three % of High Severity” from “Non-claims sources” (final column) was incorrect. Instead of “76.8% (n = 159/207)” (incorrect), it should have read “75.8% (n = 157/207)” (correct).

AB - In Table 3 of the original manuscript, the “Big Three % of High Severity” from “Non-claims sources” (final column) was incorrect. Instead of “76.8% (n = 159/207)” (incorrect), it should have read “75.8% (n = 157/207)” (correct).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113980193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113980193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/dx-2020-0034

DO - 10.1515/dx-2020-0034

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 32415823

AN - SCOPUS:85113980193

SN - 2194-8011

VL - 8

SP - 127

EP - 128

JO - Diagnosis

JF - Diagnosis

IS - 1

ER -

Erratum: Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The "big Three" - Vascular events, infections, and cancers (Diagnosis 6: 3 (227-240) (DOI: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019)

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this