TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent expression of adenosine receptor 2B promotes breast cancer stem cell enrichment (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2018) 115 (E9640-E9648) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809695115)
AU - Lan, Jie
AU - Lu, Haiquan
AU - Samanta, Debangshu
AU - Salman, Shaima
AU - Lu, You
AU - Semenza, Gregg L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/9/20
Y1 - 2022/9/20
N2 - Medical Sciences Correction for “Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent expression of adenosine receptor 2B promotes breast cancer stem cell enrichment,” by Jie Lan, Haiquan Lu, Debangshu Samanta, Shaima Salman, You Lu, and Gregg L. Semenza, which was first published September 21, 2018; 10.1073/pnas.1809695115 (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E9640–E9648). The authors note that: “During the preparation of Figure 6, incorrect data were erroneously included for the PKCd panel. The original blot which was intended to show reactivity with anti-PKCd erroneously showed a failed stripping and reprobing of the pY-STAT3 blot. A subsequent fresh blot probed with PKCd antibody was mistakenly not used in the original figure and is now shown in the corrected figure. In addition, Figure S5 in the original published manuscript erroneously used the same FACS plot for both MDA-MB-231/DEAB/sh1 and MDA-MB-231/20%/sh4. We regret these errors and have revised the figure with correct data.” The revised figures are below. Fig. 6 and the SI Appendix have been updated. (Figure Presented).
AB - Medical Sciences Correction for “Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent expression of adenosine receptor 2B promotes breast cancer stem cell enrichment,” by Jie Lan, Haiquan Lu, Debangshu Samanta, Shaima Salman, You Lu, and Gregg L. Semenza, which was first published September 21, 2018; 10.1073/pnas.1809695115 (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E9640–E9648). The authors note that: “During the preparation of Figure 6, incorrect data were erroneously included for the PKCd panel. The original blot which was intended to show reactivity with anti-PKCd erroneously showed a failed stripping and reprobing of the pY-STAT3 blot. A subsequent fresh blot probed with PKCd antibody was mistakenly not used in the original figure and is now shown in the corrected figure. In addition, Figure S5 in the original published manuscript erroneously used the same FACS plot for both MDA-MB-231/DEAB/sh1 and MDA-MB-231/20%/sh4. We regret these errors and have revised the figure with correct data.” The revised figures are below. Fig. 6 and the SI Appendix have been updated. (Figure Presented).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137154469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137154469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2210925119
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2210925119
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 36053742
AN - SCOPUS:85137154469
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 119
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 38
M1 - e2210925119
ER -