Abstract
After publication, the authors noted that they reported a sample of all females in the article. However, one of the participant/control pairings was miscoded and should have been coded as a set of males. The authors incorrectly indicated this characteristic of their sample in two places, once in the methods and once in the abstract. The correct information is below. Abstract: Published version – “Methods. Eighteen female CMI patients and 18 adult age- and education-matched control participants underwent DTI, were. . .” Corrected version – “Methods. Eighteen CMI patients and 18 adult age- and education-matched control participants underwent DTI, were. . .” Results: Published version – “Thus, 18 adult CMI female patients and 18 matched adult healthy female controls comprised the final sample.” Corrected version – “Thus, 18 adult CMI patients (1 male) and 18 matched adult healthy controls (1 male) comprised the final sample”.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2141 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Pain Medicine (United States) |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Sep 1 2021 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Neurology
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Evidence of neural microstructure abnormalities in type i chiari malformation: Associations among fiber tract integrity, pain, and cognitive dysfunction (Pain Medicine (2020) 21:10 (2323-2335) DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa094)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS