TY - JOUR
T1 - Equivalency of In-Person Versus Remote Assessment
T2 - WISC-V and KTEA-3 Performance in Clinically Referred Children and Adolescents
AU - Hamner, Taralee
AU - Salorio, Cynthia F.
AU - Kalb, Luther
AU - Jacobson, Lisa A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2021.
PY - 2022/9/27
Y1 - 2022/9/27
N2 - Objective: Teletesting has the potential to reduce numerous barriers to patient care which have only become exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although telehealth is commonly utilized throughout medicine and mental health practices, teletesting has remained limited within cognitive and academic evaluations. This may be largely due to concern for the validity of test administration via remote assessment. This cross-sectional study examined the equivalency of cognitive [Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children - Fifth Edition (WISC-V)] and academic [Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement - Third Edition (KTEA-3)] subtests administered via either teletesting or traditional in-person testing within clinically referred youth. Method: Chart review using a retrospective, cross-sectional design included a total of 893 children and adolescents, ranging from 4 to 17 years (Mean age = 10.2 years, SD = 2.9 years) who were administered at least one subtest from the aforementioned cognitive or academic assessments. Of these, 285 received teletesting, with the remaining (n = 608) receiving in-person assessment. A total of seven subtests (five from the WISC-V and two from the KTEA-3) were examined. A series of inverse probability of exposure weighted (IPEW) linear regression models examined differences between groups for each of the seven subtests after adjustment for numerous demographic, diagnostic, and parent-reported symptom variables. Results: Only two significant differences were found, such that WISC-V Visual Puzzles (p <.01) and KTEA-3 Math Concepts (p =.03) scores were slightly higher in the teletesting versus in-person groups. However, these differences were quite small in magnitude (WISC-V Visual Puzzles, d =.33, KTEA-3 Math Concepts, d =.18). Conclusions: Findings indicate equivalency across methods of service delivery without clinically meaningful differences in scores among referred pediatric patients.
AB - Objective: Teletesting has the potential to reduce numerous barriers to patient care which have only become exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although telehealth is commonly utilized throughout medicine and mental health practices, teletesting has remained limited within cognitive and academic evaluations. This may be largely due to concern for the validity of test administration via remote assessment. This cross-sectional study examined the equivalency of cognitive [Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children - Fifth Edition (WISC-V)] and academic [Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement - Third Edition (KTEA-3)] subtests administered via either teletesting or traditional in-person testing within clinically referred youth. Method: Chart review using a retrospective, cross-sectional design included a total of 893 children and adolescents, ranging from 4 to 17 years (Mean age = 10.2 years, SD = 2.9 years) who were administered at least one subtest from the aforementioned cognitive or academic assessments. Of these, 285 received teletesting, with the remaining (n = 608) receiving in-person assessment. A total of seven subtests (five from the WISC-V and two from the KTEA-3) were examined. A series of inverse probability of exposure weighted (IPEW) linear regression models examined differences between groups for each of the seven subtests after adjustment for numerous demographic, diagnostic, and parent-reported symptom variables. Results: Only two significant differences were found, such that WISC-V Visual Puzzles (p <.01) and KTEA-3 Math Concepts (p =.03) scores were slightly higher in the teletesting versus in-person groups. However, these differences were quite small in magnitude (WISC-V Visual Puzzles, d =.33, KTEA-3 Math Concepts, d =.18). Conclusions: Findings indicate equivalency across methods of service delivery without clinically meaningful differences in scores among referred pediatric patients.
KW - Academic
KW - Cognitive
KW - Neuropsychology
KW - Pediatric
KW - Telehealth
KW - Telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116522838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116522838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1355617721001053
DO - 10.1017/S1355617721001053
M3 - Article
C2 - 34569463
AN - SCOPUS:85116522838
SN - 1355-6177
VL - 28
SP - 835
EP - 844
JO - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
JF - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
IS - 8
ER -