Abstract
For 7 years, the Kidney Transplantation Committee of the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement Transplantation Network has attempted to revise the kidney allocation algorithm for adults (≥18 years) in end-stage renal disease awaiting deceased donor kidney transplants. Changes to the kidney allocation system must conform to the 1984 National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) which clearly states that allocation must take into account both efficiency (graft and person survival) and equity (fair distribution). In this article, we evaluate three allocation models: the current system, age-matching and a two-step model that we call "Equal Opportunity Supplemented by Fair Innings (EOFI)". We discuss the different conceptions of efficiency and equity employed by each model and evaluate whether EOFI could actually achieve the NOTA criteria of balancing equity and efficiency given current conditions of growing scarcity and donor-candidate age mismatch. The authors develop a multiprinciple approach to ethically justify allocation of younger deceased donor kidneys to younger adult recipients meeting the National Organ Transplant Act criteria of balancing equity and efficiency. See editorial by Gill on page 1973.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2115-2124 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | American Journal of Transplantation |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Age-matching
- efficiency
- equal opportunity
- equity
- ethics
- fair innings
- kidney transplantation
- lifespan equity
- organ allocation
- public policy
- utility
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Immunology and Allergy
- Transplantation
- Pharmacology (medical)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Equal opportunity supplemented by fair innings: Equity and efficiency in allocating deceased donor kidneys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS