TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage of First Intent With a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction
T2 - A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study (ELEMENT Trial)
AU - Chen, Yen I.
AU - Sahai, Anand
AU - Donatelli, Gianfranco
AU - Lam, Eric
AU - Forbes, Nauzer
AU - Mosko, Jeffrey
AU - Paquin, Sarto C.
AU - Donnellan, Fergal
AU - Chatterjee, Avijit
AU - Telford, Jennifer
AU - Miller, Corey
AU - Desilets, Etienne
AU - Sandha, Gurpal
AU - Kenshil, Sana
AU - Mohamed, Rachid
AU - May, Gary
AU - Gan, Ian
AU - Barkun, Jeffrey
AU - Calo, Natalia
AU - Nawawi, Abrar
AU - Friedman, Gad
AU - Cohen, Albert
AU - Maniere, Thibaut
AU - Chaudhury, Prosanto
AU - Metrakos, Peter
AU - Zogopoulos, George
AU - Bessissow, Ali
AU - Khalil, Jad Abou
AU - Baffis, Vicky
AU - Waschke, Kevin
AU - Parent, Josee
AU - Soulellis, Constantine
AU - Khashab, Mouen
AU - Kunda, Rastislav
AU - Geraci, Olivia
AU - Martel, Myriam
AU - Schwartzman, Kevin
AU - Fiore, Julio F.
AU - Rahme, Elham
AU - Barkun, Alan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Background & Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound–guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent (EUS-CDS) is a promising modality for management of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) with potential for better stent patency. We compared its outcomes with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with metal stenting (ERCP-M). Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, we recruited patients with MDBO secondary to borderline resectable, locally advanced, or unresectable peri-ampullary cancers across 10 Canadian institutions and 1 French institution. This was a superiority trial with a noninferiority assessment of technical success. Patients were randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP-M. The primary end point was the rate of stent dysfunction at 1 year, considering competing risks of death, clinical failure, and surgical resection. Analyses were performed according to intention-to-treat principles. Results: From February 2019 to February 2022, 144 patients were recruited; 73 were randomized to EUS-CDS and 71 were randomized to ERCP-M. The mean (SD) procedure time was 14.0 (11.4) minutes for EUS-CDS and 23.1 (15.6) minutes for ERCP-M (P < .01); 40% of the former was performed without fluoroscopy. Technical success was achieved in 90.4% (95% CI, 81.5% to 95.3%) of EUS-CDS and 83.1% (95% CI, 72.7% to 90.1%) of ERCP-M with a risk difference of 7.3% (95% CI, –4.0% to 18.8%) indicating noninferiority. Stent dysfunction occurred in 9.6% vs 9.9% of EUS-CDS and ERCP-M cases, respectively (P = .96). No differences in adverse events, pancreaticoduodenectomy and oncologic outcomes, or quality of life were noted. Conclusions: Although not superior in stent function, EUS-CDS is an efficient and safe alternative to ERCP-M in patients with MDBO. These findings provide evidence for greater adoption of EUS-CDS in clinical practice as a complementary and exchangeable first-line modality to ERCP in patients with MDBO. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03870386.
AB - Background & Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound–guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent (EUS-CDS) is a promising modality for management of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) with potential for better stent patency. We compared its outcomes with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with metal stenting (ERCP-M). Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, we recruited patients with MDBO secondary to borderline resectable, locally advanced, or unresectable peri-ampullary cancers across 10 Canadian institutions and 1 French institution. This was a superiority trial with a noninferiority assessment of technical success. Patients were randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP-M. The primary end point was the rate of stent dysfunction at 1 year, considering competing risks of death, clinical failure, and surgical resection. Analyses were performed according to intention-to-treat principles. Results: From February 2019 to February 2022, 144 patients were recruited; 73 were randomized to EUS-CDS and 71 were randomized to ERCP-M. The mean (SD) procedure time was 14.0 (11.4) minutes for EUS-CDS and 23.1 (15.6) minutes for ERCP-M (P < .01); 40% of the former was performed without fluoroscopy. Technical success was achieved in 90.4% (95% CI, 81.5% to 95.3%) of EUS-CDS and 83.1% (95% CI, 72.7% to 90.1%) of ERCP-M with a risk difference of 7.3% (95% CI, –4.0% to 18.8%) indicating noninferiority. Stent dysfunction occurred in 9.6% vs 9.9% of EUS-CDS and ERCP-M cases, respectively (P = .96). No differences in adverse events, pancreaticoduodenectomy and oncologic outcomes, or quality of life were noted. Conclusions: Although not superior in stent function, EUS-CDS is an efficient and safe alternative to ERCP-M in patients with MDBO. These findings provide evidence for greater adoption of EUS-CDS in clinical practice as a complementary and exchangeable first-line modality to ERCP in patients with MDBO. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03870386.
KW - Biliary Obstruction
KW - ERCP
KW - Endoscopic Ultrasonography
KW - Pancreatic Cancer
KW - Stent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172469207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85172469207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.07.024
DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.07.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 37549753
AN - SCOPUS:85172469207
SN - 0016-5085
VL - 165
SP - 1249-1261.e5
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
IS - 5
ER -