Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage of First Intent With a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study (ELEMENT Trial)

Yen I. Chen, Anand Sahai, Gianfranco Donatelli, Eric Lam, Nauzer Forbes, Jeffrey Mosko, Sarto C. Paquin, Fergal Donnellan, Avijit Chatterjee, Jennifer Telford, Corey Miller, Etienne Desilets, Gurpal Sandha, Sana Kenshil, Rachid Mohamed, Gary May, Ian Gan, Jeffrey Barkun, Natalia Calo, Abrar NawawiGad Friedman, Albert Cohen, Thibaut Maniere, Prosanto Chaudhury, Peter Metrakos, George Zogopoulos, Ali Bessissow, Jad Abou Khalil, Vicky Baffis, Kevin Waschke, Josee Parent, Constantine Soulellis, Mouen Khashab, Rastislav Kunda, Olivia Geraci, Myriam Martel, Kevin Schwartzman, Julio F. Fiore, Elham Rahme, Alan Barkun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background & Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound–guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent (EUS-CDS) is a promising modality for management of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) with potential for better stent patency. We compared its outcomes with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with metal stenting (ERCP-M). Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, we recruited patients with MDBO secondary to borderline resectable, locally advanced, or unresectable peri-ampullary cancers across 10 Canadian institutions and 1 French institution. This was a superiority trial with a noninferiority assessment of technical success. Patients were randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP-M. The primary end point was the rate of stent dysfunction at 1 year, considering competing risks of death, clinical failure, and surgical resection. Analyses were performed according to intention-to-treat principles. Results: From February 2019 to February 2022, 144 patients were recruited; 73 were randomized to EUS-CDS and 71 were randomized to ERCP-M. The mean (SD) procedure time was 14.0 (11.4) minutes for EUS-CDS and 23.1 (15.6) minutes for ERCP-M (P < .01); 40% of the former was performed without fluoroscopy. Technical success was achieved in 90.4% (95% CI, 81.5% to 95.3%) of EUS-CDS and 83.1% (95% CI, 72.7% to 90.1%) of ERCP-M with a risk difference of 7.3% (95% CI, –4.0% to 18.8%) indicating noninferiority. Stent dysfunction occurred in 9.6% vs 9.9% of EUS-CDS and ERCP-M cases, respectively (P = .96). No differences in adverse events, pancreaticoduodenectomy and oncologic outcomes, or quality of life were noted. Conclusions: Although not superior in stent function, EUS-CDS is an efficient and safe alternative to ERCP-M in patients with MDBO. These findings provide evidence for greater adoption of EUS-CDS in clinical practice as a complementary and exchangeable first-line modality to ERCP in patients with MDBO. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03870386.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1249-1261.e5
JournalGastroenterology
Volume165
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • Biliary Obstruction
  • ERCP
  • Endoscopic Ultrasonography
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Stent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage of First Intent With a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study (ELEMENT Trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this