TY - JOUR
T1 - End-of-life issues in intensive care units
T2 - A national random survey of nurses' knowledge and beliefs
AU - Puntillo, Kathleen A.
AU - Benner, Patricia
AU - Drought, Theresa
AU - Drew, Barbara
AU - Stotts, Nancy
AU - Stannard, Daphne
AU - Rushton, Cynthia
AU - Scanlon, Colleen
AU - White, Cheri
PY - 2001/7/1
Y1 - 2001/7/1
N2 - • Objective To investigate the knowledge, beliefs, and ethical concerns of nurses caring for patients dying in intensive care units. • Methods A survey was mailed to 3000 members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. The survey contained various scenarios depicting end-of-life actions for patients: pain management, withholding or withdrawing life support, assisted suicide, and voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia. • Results Most of the respondents (N = 906) correctly identified the distinctions among the end-of-life actions depicted in the scenarios. Almost all (99%-100%) agreed with the actions of pain management and withholding or withdrawing life support. A total of 83% disagreed with assisted suicide, 95% disagreed with voluntary euthanasia, and 89% to 98% disagreed with nonvoluntary euthanasia. Most (78%) thought that dying patients frequently (31%) or sometimes (47%) received inadequate pain medicine, and almost all agreed with the double-effect principle. Communication between nurses and physicians was generally effective, but unit-level conferences that focused on grief counseling and debriefing staff rarely (38%) or never (49%) occurred. Among the respondents, 37% had been asked to assist in hastening a patient's death. Although 59% reported that they seldom acted against their consciences in caring for dying patients, 34% indicated that they sometimes had acted against their conscience, and 6% had done so to a great extent. • Conclusions Intensive care unit nurses strongly support good pain management for dying patients and withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapies to allow unavoidable death. The vast majority oppose assisted suicide and euthanasia. Wider professional and public dialogue on end-of-life care in intensive care units is warranted.
AB - • Objective To investigate the knowledge, beliefs, and ethical concerns of nurses caring for patients dying in intensive care units. • Methods A survey was mailed to 3000 members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. The survey contained various scenarios depicting end-of-life actions for patients: pain management, withholding or withdrawing life support, assisted suicide, and voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia. • Results Most of the respondents (N = 906) correctly identified the distinctions among the end-of-life actions depicted in the scenarios. Almost all (99%-100%) agreed with the actions of pain management and withholding or withdrawing life support. A total of 83% disagreed with assisted suicide, 95% disagreed with voluntary euthanasia, and 89% to 98% disagreed with nonvoluntary euthanasia. Most (78%) thought that dying patients frequently (31%) or sometimes (47%) received inadequate pain medicine, and almost all agreed with the double-effect principle. Communication between nurses and physicians was generally effective, but unit-level conferences that focused on grief counseling and debriefing staff rarely (38%) or never (49%) occurred. Among the respondents, 37% had been asked to assist in hastening a patient's death. Although 59% reported that they seldom acted against their consciences in caring for dying patients, 34% indicated that they sometimes had acted against their conscience, and 6% had done so to a great extent. • Conclusions Intensive care unit nurses strongly support good pain management for dying patients and withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapies to allow unavoidable death. The vast majority oppose assisted suicide and euthanasia. Wider professional and public dialogue on end-of-life care in intensive care units is warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035403397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035403397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 11432210
AN - SCOPUS:0035403397
SN - 1062-3264
VL - 10
SP - 216
EP - 229
JO - American Journal of Critical Care
JF - American Journal of Critical Care
IS - 4
ER -