Abstract
Object. Traditionally, hemisacrectomy and internal hemipelvectomy procedures have required both an anterior and a posterior approach. A posterior-only approach has the potential to complete an en bloc tumor resection and spinopelvic reconstruction while reducing surgical morbidity. Methods. The authors describe 3 cases in which en bloc resection of the hemisacrum and ilium and subsequent lumbopelvic and pelvic ring reconstruction were performed from a posterior-only approach. Two more traditional anterior and posterior staged procedures are also included for comparison. Results. In all 3 cases, an oncologically appropriate surgery and spinopelvic reconstruction were performed through a posterior-only approach. Conclusions. The advantage of a midline posterior approach is the ability to perform a lumbosacral reconstruction, necessary in cases in which the S-1 body is iatrogenically disrupted during tumor resection.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 458-467 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2014 |
Keywords
- Hemisacrectomy
- Internal hemipelvectomy
- Lumbosacral reconstruction
- Posterior approach
- Sacral
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Neurology
- Clinical Neurology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'En bloc hemisacrectomy and internal hemipelvectomy via the posterior approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS