Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy of quality improvement and patient safety workshops for students: A pilot study

  • Kevin P. Shah
  • , Shreya Goyal
  • , Vignesh Ramachandran
  • , Jaden R. Kohn
  • , Jonathan A. Go
  • , Zachary Wiley
  • , Anoosha Moturu
  • , Meera K. Namireddy
  • , Anjali Kumar
  • , Ryan C. Jacobs
  • , Matthew Stampfl
  • , Jesal R. Shah
  • , Justin Fu
  • , Weijie V. Lin
  • , Brandon Ho
  • , Grace Wey
  • , Sophie Y. Lin
  • , Andrew C. Caruso
  • , Lindsey Jordan Gay
  • , Diana E. Stewart
  • Sara Andrabi

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: While the Association of American Medical Colleges encourages medical schools to incorporate quality improvement and patient safety (QI/PS) into their curriculum, medical students continue to have limited QI/PS exposure. To prepare medical students for careers that involve QI/PS, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement chapter at an allopathic medical school and school of allied health professions initiated self-directed learning by offering student-led workshops to equip learners with skills to improve the quality and safety of healthcare processes. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, workshops were hosted for medical students between 2015 and 2018 on five QI/PS topics: Process Mapping, Root-Cause Analysis (RCA), Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycles, Evidence Based Medicine (EBM), and Patient Handoffs. Each workshop included a hands-on component to engage learners in practical applications of QI/PS skills in their careers. Change in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors was assessed via pre- and post-surveys using 5-point Likert scales, and analyzed using either the McNemar test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Surveys also gathered qualitative feedback regarding strengths, future areas for improvement, and reasons for attending the workshops. Results: Data was collected from 88.5% of learners (n = 185/209); 19.5% of learners reported prior formal instruction in these topics. Statistically significant improvements in learners' confidence were observed for each workshop. Additionally, after attending workshops, learners felt comfortable teaching the learned QI/PS skill to colleagues (mean pre/post difference 1.96, p < 0.0001, n = 139) and were more likely to pursue QI/PS projects in their careers (mean pre/post difference 0.45, p < 0.0001, n = 139). Lastly, learners demonstrated a statistically significant increase in knowledge in four out of five skills workshop topics. Conclusion: Few medical students have formal instruction in QI/PS tools. This pilot study highlights advantages of incorporating an innovative, student-directed modified 'flipped classroom' methodology, with a focus on active experiential learning and minimal didactic instruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number126
JournalBMC medical education
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 23 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Curriculum
  • Experiential learning
  • Hands-on
  • Health professions students
  • Medical education
  • Medical students
  • Patient safety
  • Peer-to-peer teaching
  • Quality improvement
  • Student-led
  • Workshops

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of quality improvement and patient safety workshops for students: A pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this