TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of processed meat and drinking water nitrate on oral and fecal microbial populations in a controlled feeding study
AU - PHYTOME consortium members
AU - Sinha, Rashmi
AU - Zhao, Ni
AU - Goedert, James J.
AU - Byrd, Doratha A.
AU - Wan, Yunhu
AU - Hua, Xing
AU - Hullings, Autumn G.
AU - Knight, Rob
AU - Breda, Simone van
AU - Mathijs, Karen
AU - de Kok, Theo M.
AU - Ward, Mary H.
AU - Pieters, Harm Jan
AU - Sági-Kiss, Virág
AU - Kuhnle, Gunter G.
AU - Georgiadis, Panagiotis
AU - Saccani, Giovanna
AU - Parolari, Giovanni
AU - Virgili, Roberta
AU - Hemke, Gert
AU - Hung, Yung
AU - Verbeke, Wim
AU - Masclee, Ad A.
AU - Vleugels-Simon, Carla B.
AU - van Bodegraven, Adriaan A.
AU - Dobbelaere, Dirk
AU - Vandewynkel, Anneleen
AU - Kruijk, Richard van der
AU - Egberts, Frans
AU - Helvoirt, Jan Hein van
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: One mechanism that can explain the link between processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer (CRC) is the production of carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds (NOCs) in the gastrointestinal tract. Oral and gut microbes metabolize ingested proteins (a source of secondary and tertiary amines and amides) and can reduce nitrate to nitrite, generating potentially carcinogenic NOCs. Objective: We evaluated whether nitrate/nitrite in processed meat or water influences the fecal or salivary microbiota. Design: In this dietary intervention study, 63 volunteers consumed diets high in conventional processed meats for two weeks, switched to diets high in poultry for two weeks, and then consumed phytochemical-enriched conventional processed or low-nitrite processed meat diets for two weeks. During the intervention, they drank water with low nitrate concentrations and consumed a healthy diet with low antioxidants. Then the volunteers drank nitrate-enriched water for 1 week, in combination with one of the four different diets. We measured creatinine-adjusted urinary nitrate levels and characterized the oral and fecal microbiota using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Results: Using linear mixed models, we found that, compared to baseline, urinary nitrate levels were reduced during the phytochemical-enriched low-nitrite meat diet (p-value = 0.009) and modestly during the poultry diet (p-value = 0.048). In contrast, urinary nitrate increased after 1-week of drinking nitrate-enriched water (p-value<10−5). Nitrate-enriched water, but not processed meats with or without phytochemicals, altered the saliva microbial population (p-value ≤0.001), and significantly increased abundance of 8 bacterial taxa, especially genus Neisseria and other nitrate-reducing taxa. Meats, phytochemicals and nitrate-enriched water had no significant effects on saliva alpha diversity or any diversity parameter measured for the fecal microbiota. Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that drinking high nitrate water increases oral nitrate-reducing bacteria, which likely results in increased NOC. However, meat nitrate/nitrite at the levels tested had no effect on either the gut or oral bacteria. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04138654.
AB - Background: One mechanism that can explain the link between processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer (CRC) is the production of carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds (NOCs) in the gastrointestinal tract. Oral and gut microbes metabolize ingested proteins (a source of secondary and tertiary amines and amides) and can reduce nitrate to nitrite, generating potentially carcinogenic NOCs. Objective: We evaluated whether nitrate/nitrite in processed meat or water influences the fecal or salivary microbiota. Design: In this dietary intervention study, 63 volunteers consumed diets high in conventional processed meats for two weeks, switched to diets high in poultry for two weeks, and then consumed phytochemical-enriched conventional processed or low-nitrite processed meat diets for two weeks. During the intervention, they drank water with low nitrate concentrations and consumed a healthy diet with low antioxidants. Then the volunteers drank nitrate-enriched water for 1 week, in combination with one of the four different diets. We measured creatinine-adjusted urinary nitrate levels and characterized the oral and fecal microbiota using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Results: Using linear mixed models, we found that, compared to baseline, urinary nitrate levels were reduced during the phytochemical-enriched low-nitrite meat diet (p-value = 0.009) and modestly during the poultry diet (p-value = 0.048). In contrast, urinary nitrate increased after 1-week of drinking nitrate-enriched water (p-value<10−5). Nitrate-enriched water, but not processed meats with or without phytochemicals, altered the saliva microbial population (p-value ≤0.001), and significantly increased abundance of 8 bacterial taxa, especially genus Neisseria and other nitrate-reducing taxa. Meats, phytochemicals and nitrate-enriched water had no significant effects on saliva alpha diversity or any diversity parameter measured for the fecal microbiota. Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that drinking high nitrate water increases oral nitrate-reducing bacteria, which likely results in increased NOC. However, meat nitrate/nitrite at the levels tested had no effect on either the gut or oral bacteria. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04138654.
KW - Nitrite
KW - Oral and fecal microbiome
KW - Phytochemicals
KW - Processed meat
KW - Water nitrate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103709705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103709705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111084
DO - 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111084
M3 - Article
C2 - 33785324
AN - SCOPUS:85103709705
SN - 0013-9351
VL - 197
JO - Environmental research
JF - Environmental research
M1 - 111084
ER -