TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid
T2 - A randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population
AU - Miller, David P.
AU - Spangler, John G.
AU - Case, L. Doug
AU - Goff, David C.
AU - Singh, Sonal
AU - Pignone, Michael P.
N1 - Funding Information:
MPP was supported by a National Cancer Institute Established Investigator Award (K05 CA129166).
Funding Information:
This study was funded by a Cancer Control Career Development Award (DPM) from the American Cancer Society (CCCDA-05-162-01).
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces mortality yet remains underutilized. Low health literacy may contribute to this underutilization by interfering with patients' ability to understand and receive preventive health services. Purpose: To determine if a web-based multimedia CRC screening patient decision aid, developed for a mixed-literacy audience, could increase CRC screening. Design: RCT. Patients aged 5074 years and overdue for CRC screening were randomized to the web-based decision aid or a control program seen immediately before a scheduled primary care appointment. Setting/participants: A large community-based, university-affiliated internal medicine practice serving a socioeconomically disadvantaged population. Main outcome measures: Patients completed surveys to determine their ability to state a screening test preference and their readiness to receive screening. Charts were abstracted by masked observers to determine if screening tests were ordered and completed. Results: Between November 2007 and September 2008, a total of 264 patients enrolled in the study. Data collection was completed in 2009, and data analysis was completed in 2010. A majority of participants (mean age=57.8 years) were female (67%), African-American (74%), had annual household incomes of <$20,000 (76%), and had limited health literacy (56%). When compared to control participants, more decision-aid participants had a CRC screening preference (84% vs 55%, p<0.0001) and an increase in readiness to receive screening (52% vs 20%, p=0.0001). More decision-aid participants had CRC screening tests ordered (30% vs 21%) and completed (19% vs 14%), but no statistically significant differences were seen (AOR=1.6, 95% CI=0.97, 2.8, and AOR=1.7, 95% CI=0.88, 3.2, respectively). Similar results were found across literacy levels. Conclusions: The web-based decision aid increased patients' ability to form a test preference and their intent to receive screening, regardless of literacy level. Further study should examine ways the decision aid can be combined with additional system changes to increase CRC screening.
AB - Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces mortality yet remains underutilized. Low health literacy may contribute to this underutilization by interfering with patients' ability to understand and receive preventive health services. Purpose: To determine if a web-based multimedia CRC screening patient decision aid, developed for a mixed-literacy audience, could increase CRC screening. Design: RCT. Patients aged 5074 years and overdue for CRC screening were randomized to the web-based decision aid or a control program seen immediately before a scheduled primary care appointment. Setting/participants: A large community-based, university-affiliated internal medicine practice serving a socioeconomically disadvantaged population. Main outcome measures: Patients completed surveys to determine their ability to state a screening test preference and their readiness to receive screening. Charts were abstracted by masked observers to determine if screening tests were ordered and completed. Results: Between November 2007 and September 2008, a total of 264 patients enrolled in the study. Data collection was completed in 2009, and data analysis was completed in 2010. A majority of participants (mean age=57.8 years) were female (67%), African-American (74%), had annual household incomes of <$20,000 (76%), and had limited health literacy (56%). When compared to control participants, more decision-aid participants had a CRC screening preference (84% vs 55%, p<0.0001) and an increase in readiness to receive screening (52% vs 20%, p=0.0001). More decision-aid participants had CRC screening tests ordered (30% vs 21%) and completed (19% vs 14%), but no statistically significant differences were seen (AOR=1.6, 95% CI=0.97, 2.8, and AOR=1.7, 95% CI=0.88, 3.2, respectively). Similar results were found across literacy levels. Conclusions: The web-based decision aid increased patients' ability to form a test preference and their intent to receive screening, regardless of literacy level. Further study should examine ways the decision aid can be combined with additional system changes to increase CRC screening.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955792964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955792964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.019
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 21565651
AN - SCOPUS:79955792964
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 40
SP - 608
EP - 615
JO - American journal of preventive medicine
JF - American journal of preventive medicine
IS - 6
ER -