TY - JOUR
T1 - Educational research at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
T2 - A grassroots development
AU - Thomas, Patricia A.
AU - Wright, Scott M.
AU - Kern, David E.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004/10
Y1 - 2004/10
N2 - The Divisions of General Internal Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine have been a rich source of educational research. To better understand the facilitators and barriers to educational research within the divisions, the authors reviewed published educational research from the divisions published between 1995-2004 and examined the history, leadership decisions, and sentinel events that have allowed educational scholarship within the divisions to grow. The authors' analysis suggests a grassroots model of programmatic growth that includes a growing cadre of clinician-educator scholars, effective mentorship, a faculty development program, access to learners, access to research expertise, protected time for scholarship, some funding, and an institutional culture that stimulates scholarship. A medical education fellowship was integral to the model; fellows were first authors for 47% of reviewed manuscripts. Extramural funding has helped build an infrastructure that supports educational scholarship; however, only 12% of the publications have had extramural funding. Protected time for faculty is the characteristic of this model most at risk. While there has been a move toward more institutional support of educational research, it is clear that further growth in the educational research program will require noninstitutional resources.
AB - The Divisions of General Internal Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine have been a rich source of educational research. To better understand the facilitators and barriers to educational research within the divisions, the authors reviewed published educational research from the divisions published between 1995-2004 and examined the history, leadership decisions, and sentinel events that have allowed educational scholarship within the divisions to grow. The authors' analysis suggests a grassroots model of programmatic growth that includes a growing cadre of clinician-educator scholars, effective mentorship, a faculty development program, access to learners, access to research expertise, protected time for scholarship, some funding, and an institutional culture that stimulates scholarship. A medical education fellowship was integral to the model; fellows were first authors for 47% of reviewed manuscripts. Extramural funding has helped build an infrastructure that supports educational scholarship; however, only 12% of the publications have had extramural funding. Protected time for faculty is the characteristic of this model most at risk. While there has been a move toward more institutional support of educational research, it is clear that further growth in the educational research program will require noninstitutional resources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4644230988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4644230988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00017
DO - 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00017
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15383358
AN - SCOPUS:4644230988
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 79
SP - 975
EP - 980
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 10
ER -