Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?

  • Stephen C. Weber

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

Abstract

The Delphi Consensus Process is a tool to allow diverse expert opinion to be consolidated to better understand complex problems. The process has recently been applied to orthopaedic treatment options. While a piece of the puzzle, the strengths and weaknesses of this process must be understood to allow the orthopaedist to apply the conclusions of the Delphi Consensus process effectively. It is important to recognize that expert opinion has been upended time and time again by carefully collected clinical-outcome data. It is unclear whether the visions of the Oracle are due to wisdom or toxic fumes resulting in a strange trance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-249
Number of pages3
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this