TY - JOUR
T1 - Early survival prediction after intra-arterial therapies
T2 - a 3D quantitative MRI assessment of tumour response after TACE or radioembolization of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver
AU - Chapiro, Julius
AU - Duran, Rafael
AU - Lin, Ming De
AU - Schernthaner, Rüdiger
AU - Lesage, David
AU - Wang, Zhijun
AU - Savic, Lynn Jeanette
AU - Geschwind, Jean François
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, European Society of Radiology.
PY - 2015/7/8
Y1 - 2015/7/8
N2 - Objectives: This study evaluated the predictive role of 1D, 2D and 3D quantitative, enhancement-based MRI regarding overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) following intra-arterial therapies (IAT). Methods: This retrospective analysis included 29 patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization and received MRI within 6 weeks after therapy. Tumour response was assessed using 1D and 2D criteria (such as European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines [EASL] and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [mRECIST]). In addition, a segmentation-based 3D quantification of overall (volumetric [v] RECIST) and enhancing lesion volume (quantitative [q] EASL) was performed on portal venous phase MRI. Accordingly, patients were classified as responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR). Results: Only enhancement-based criteria identified patients as responders. EASL and mRECIST did not predict patient survival (P = 0.27 and P = 0.44, respectively). Using uni- and multivariate analysis, qEASL was identified as the sole predictor of patient survival (9.9 months for R, 6.9 months for NR; P = 0.038; HR 0.4). Conclusion: The ability of qEASL to predict survival early after IAT provides evidence for potential advantages of 3D quantitative tumour analysis. Key Points: • Volumetric assessment of colorectal liver metastases after intra-arterial therapy is feasible. • Early 3D quantitative tumour analysis after intra-arterial therapy may predict patient survival. • Volumetric tumour response assessment shows advantages over 1D and 2D techniques. • Enhancement-based MR response assessment is preferable to size-based measurements.
AB - Objectives: This study evaluated the predictive role of 1D, 2D and 3D quantitative, enhancement-based MRI regarding overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) following intra-arterial therapies (IAT). Methods: This retrospective analysis included 29 patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization and received MRI within 6 weeks after therapy. Tumour response was assessed using 1D and 2D criteria (such as European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines [EASL] and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [mRECIST]). In addition, a segmentation-based 3D quantification of overall (volumetric [v] RECIST) and enhancing lesion volume (quantitative [q] EASL) was performed on portal venous phase MRI. Accordingly, patients were classified as responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR). Results: Only enhancement-based criteria identified patients as responders. EASL and mRECIST did not predict patient survival (P = 0.27 and P = 0.44, respectively). Using uni- and multivariate analysis, qEASL was identified as the sole predictor of patient survival (9.9 months for R, 6.9 months for NR; P = 0.038; HR 0.4). Conclusion: The ability of qEASL to predict survival early after IAT provides evidence for potential advantages of 3D quantitative tumour analysis. Key Points: • Volumetric assessment of colorectal liver metastases after intra-arterial therapy is feasible. • Early 3D quantitative tumour analysis after intra-arterial therapy may predict patient survival. • Volumetric tumour response assessment shows advantages over 1D and 2D techniques. • Enhancement-based MR response assessment is preferable to size-based measurements.
KW - Chemoembolization
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Liver cancer
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Metastases
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930474400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930474400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-015-3595-5
DO - 10.1007/s00330-015-3595-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 25636420
AN - SCOPUS:84930474400
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 25
SP - 1993
EP - 2003
JO - European radiology
JF - European radiology
IS - 7
ER -