TY - JOUR
T1 - Domestic poultry-raising practices in a Peruvian shantytown
T2 - Implications for control of Campylobacter jejuni-associated diarrhea
AU - Harvey, Steven A.
AU - Winch, Peter J.
AU - Leontsini, Elli
AU - Torres Gayoso, Cecilia
AU - López Romero, Sonia
AU - Gilman, Robert H.
AU - Oberhelman, Richard A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Our sincerest thanks to the residents and the health promoters of Las Pampas de San Juan de Miraflores for their participation and their many contributions and suggestions. Project veterinarian Dr Mónica Alba Chincha of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos and agronomist Ing. Pedro Ciriaco of the Universidad Nacional Agraria-La Molina provided invaluable technical assistance. A.B. PRISMA and NAMRID Lima contributed tremendously to logistics, transportation and data collection and management. Special thanks to Lilia Cabrera Rojo, Ruth Centeno, Elizabeth Goodrich, Paula Maguiña, Cecilia Oroya, Juan Pérez, Guillermo Rospigliosi, Marco Valera, Dr Stephen Walz, and Dr Douglas Watts. Our appreciation to the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments. Finally, many thanks to the Thrasher Research Fund for supporting this study.
PY - 2003/4/1
Y1 - 2003/4/1
N2 - Raising poultry at home is common in many periurban communities in low-income countries. Studies demonstrate that free-range domestic poultry increase children's risk of infection with diarrhea-causing organisms such as Campylobacter jejuni. Corralling might reduce risk, but research on the socioeconomic acceptability of corralling is lacking. To explore this issue, we studied local knowledge and practices related to poultry-raising in a Peruvian shantytown. Our objectives were to understand: (1) motives for raising domestic poultry; (2) economic and cultural factors that affect the feasibility of corralling; and (3) local perceptions about the relationship between domestic poultry and disease. During 1999-2000, we met with community health volunteers and conducted ethnographic and structured interviews with residents about poultry-raising practices. We then enrolled 12 families in a 2-month trial of corral use during which field workers made biweekly surveillance visits to each family. Most participants reported that they raise birds because home-grown poultry and eggs taste better and are more nutritious and because they enjoy living around animals. Some want to teach their children about raising animals. To prevent theft, many residents shut their birds in provisional enclosures at night, but most stated that birds are healthier, happier, and produce better meat and eggs when let loose by day. Many view bird feces in the house and yard as dirty, but few see a connection to illness. Residents consider chicks and ducklings more innocuous than adult birds and are more likely to allow them inside the house and permit children to play with them. After extensive orientation and technical assistance, participants were willing to corral birds more often. But due to perceived disadvantages, many kept birds penned only intermittently. Additional food and water costs were a significant obstacle for some. Adequate space, bird care and corral hygiene would also need to be addressed to make this intervention viable. Developing a secure, acceptable and affordable corral remains a challenge in this population.
AB - Raising poultry at home is common in many periurban communities in low-income countries. Studies demonstrate that free-range domestic poultry increase children's risk of infection with diarrhea-causing organisms such as Campylobacter jejuni. Corralling might reduce risk, but research on the socioeconomic acceptability of corralling is lacking. To explore this issue, we studied local knowledge and practices related to poultry-raising in a Peruvian shantytown. Our objectives were to understand: (1) motives for raising domestic poultry; (2) economic and cultural factors that affect the feasibility of corralling; and (3) local perceptions about the relationship between domestic poultry and disease. During 1999-2000, we met with community health volunteers and conducted ethnographic and structured interviews with residents about poultry-raising practices. We then enrolled 12 families in a 2-month trial of corral use during which field workers made biweekly surveillance visits to each family. Most participants reported that they raise birds because home-grown poultry and eggs taste better and are more nutritious and because they enjoy living around animals. Some want to teach their children about raising animals. To prevent theft, many residents shut their birds in provisional enclosures at night, but most stated that birds are healthier, happier, and produce better meat and eggs when let loose by day. Many view bird feces in the house and yard as dirty, but few see a connection to illness. Residents consider chicks and ducklings more innocuous than adult birds and are more likely to allow them inside the house and permit children to play with them. After extensive orientation and technical assistance, participants were willing to corral birds more often. But due to perceived disadvantages, many kept birds penned only intermittently. Additional food and water costs were a significant obstacle for some. Adequate space, bird care and corral hygiene would also need to be addressed to make this intervention viable. Developing a secure, acceptable and affordable corral remains a challenge in this population.
KW - Anthropological methods
KW - Campylobacter jejuni
KW - Diarrhea
KW - Hygiene behavior
KW - Peru
KW - Poultry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037396004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037396004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0001-706X(03)00006-8
DO - 10.1016/S0001-706X(03)00006-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 12711102
AN - SCOPUS:0037396004
SN - 0001-706X
VL - 86
SP - 41
EP - 54
JO - Acta Tropica
JF - Acta Tropica
IS - 1
ER -