TY - JOUR
T1 - Does the presence of priming hinder subsequent recognition or recall performance?
AU - Stark, Shauna M.
AU - Gordon, Barry
AU - Stark, Craig E.L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Address correspondence to: Shauna M. Stark, now at University of California, Irvine, Department of Neurobiology & Behavior, 211 Qureshy Research Laboratory, Irvine, CA 92629, USA. E-mail: [email protected] We thank Stacy Calkins, Vicky Smrcka, Jacqueline Weaver, and Erica Woodland for help with data collection and analysis. We also thank Dr Anthony Wagner for his discussion and comments. This research was supported by The Benjamin A. Miller Family Endowment for Aging, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Autism, by the Appel Fund, and by The Therapeutic Cognitive Neuroscience Research Fund.
PY - 2008/2
Y1 - 2008/2
N2 - Declarative and non-declarative memories are thought be supported by two distinct memory systems that are often posited not to interact. However, Wagner, Maril, and Schacter (2000a) reported that at the time priming was assessed, greater behavioural and neural priming was associated with lower levels of subsequent recognition memory, demonstrating an interaction between declarative and non-declarative memory. We examined this finding using a similar paradigm, in which participants made the same or different semantic word judgements following a short or long lag and subsequent memory test. We found a similar overall pattern of results, with greater behavioural priming associated with a decrease in recognition and recall performance. However, neither various within-participant nor various between-participant analyses revealed significant correlations between priming and subsequent memory performance. These data suggest that both lag and task have effects on priming and declarative memory performance, but that they are largely independent and occur in parallel.
AB - Declarative and non-declarative memories are thought be supported by two distinct memory systems that are often posited not to interact. However, Wagner, Maril, and Schacter (2000a) reported that at the time priming was assessed, greater behavioural and neural priming was associated with lower levels of subsequent recognition memory, demonstrating an interaction between declarative and non-declarative memory. We examined this finding using a similar paradigm, in which participants made the same or different semantic word judgements following a short or long lag and subsequent memory test. We found a similar overall pattern of results, with greater behavioural priming associated with a decrease in recognition and recall performance. However, neither various within-participant nor various between-participant analyses revealed significant correlations between priming and subsequent memory performance. These data suggest that both lag and task have effects on priming and declarative memory performance, but that they are largely independent and occur in parallel.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39749154712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39749154712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09658210701872807
DO - 10.1080/09658210701872807
M3 - Article
C2 - 18286420
AN - SCOPUS:39749154712
SN - 0965-8211
VL - 16
SP - 157
EP - 173
JO - Memory
JF - Memory
IS - 2
ER -