TY - JOUR
T1 - Do provincial drug benefit initiatives create an effective policy lab? The evidence from canada
AU - Pomey, Marie Pascale
AU - Morgan, Steve
AU - Church, John
AU - Forest, Pierre Gerlier
AU - Lavis, John N.
AU - McIntosh, Tom
AU - Smith, Neale
AU - Petrela, Jennifer
AU - Martin, Elisabeth
AU - Dobson, Sarah
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Although the costs of doctors' visits and hospital stays in Canada are covered by national public health insurance, the cost of outpatient prescription drugs is not. To solve problems of access, Canadian provinces have introduced provincial prescription drug benefit programs. This study analyzes the prescription drug policy- making process in five Canadian provinces between 1992 and 2004 with a view to (1) determining the federal government's role in the area of prescription drugs; (2) describing the policy-making process; (3) identifying factors in each province's choice of a policy; (4) identifying patterns in those factors across the five provinces; and (5) assessing the federal government's influence on the policies chosen. Analysis shows that despite significant differences in policy choices, the ideological motivations of the provinces were unexpectedly similar. The findings also highlight the importance of institutional factors, for example, in provinces' decision to compete rather than to collaborate. We conclude that, to date, Canada's federalism laboratory has only partly benefited the Canadian public. Cost pressures may, however, eventually overcome barriers to cooperation between the provincial and the federal governments, enabling them to capitalize on Canada's federal structure to improve the accessibility and affordability of drugs.
AB - Although the costs of doctors' visits and hospital stays in Canada are covered by national public health insurance, the cost of outpatient prescription drugs is not. To solve problems of access, Canadian provinces have introduced provincial prescription drug benefit programs. This study analyzes the prescription drug policy- making process in five Canadian provinces between 1992 and 2004 with a view to (1) determining the federal government's role in the area of prescription drugs; (2) describing the policy-making process; (3) identifying factors in each province's choice of a policy; (4) identifying patterns in those factors across the five provinces; and (5) assessing the federal government's influence on the policies chosen. Analysis shows that despite significant differences in policy choices, the ideological motivations of the provinces were unexpectedly similar. The findings also highlight the importance of institutional factors, for example, in provinces' decision to compete rather than to collaborate. We conclude that, to date, Canada's federalism laboratory has only partly benefited the Canadian public. Cost pressures may, however, eventually overcome barriers to cooperation between the provincial and the federal governments, enabling them to capitalize on Canada's federal structure to improve the accessibility and affordability of drugs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650164095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650164095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1215/03616878-2010-025
DO - 10.1215/03616878-2010-025
M3 - Article
C2 - 21123668
AN - SCOPUS:78650164095
SN - 0361-6878
VL - 35
SP - 705
EP - 742
JO - Journal of health politics, policy and law
JF - Journal of health politics, policy and law
IS - 5
ER -