Do Peer Navigators Improve Initiation and Retention in HIV/VH/STI Treatment Programs for People from Key Populations? A Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Values and Preferences, and Cost

Background:Key populations are disproportionately affected by HIV, viral hepatitis (VH), and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and face barriers to care. Peer navigation programs are widely used, but evidence supporting their use has not been synthesized.Setting:Peer navigation programs for sex workers, men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, prisoners, and trans and gender diverse people globally.Methods:To inform World Health Organization guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of effectiveness, values and preferences, and cost studies published between January 2010 and May 2021. We searched CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and EMBASE; screened abstracts; and extracted data in duplicate. The effectiveness review included randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies evaluating time to diagnosis or linkage to care, treatment initiation, treatment retention/completion, viral load, cure, or mortality. We assessed risk of bias and summarized findings in GRADE evidence profiles. Values and preferences and cost data were summarized descriptively.Results:Four studies evaluated the effectiveness of peer navigators for key populations. All were focused on HIV; none were designed for VH or STIs. These studies showed mixed effects on linkage to care, treatment retention/completion, and viral load; no studies measured treatment initiation, cure, or mortality. Two values and preferences studies with community-based organization staff and health workers suggested peer navigators for key populations were acceptable and valued, although continued challenges remained. No cost studies were identified.Conclusions:Although limited, available studies provide moderate certainty evidence for benefits of HIV/VH/STI peer navigation programs for key populations. Further evaluations are needed.