Do all material incentives for pro-social activities backfire? The response to cash and non-cash incentives for blood donations

Nicola Lacetera, Mario Macis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

98 Scopus citations

Abstract

A number of experimental studies have documented that financial rewards discourage the performance of altruistic activities because they conflict with intrinsic altruistic motivations. However, it is unclear whether this is evidence of a generalized aversion to rewards or, rather, an aversion to receiving specific material prizes, such as cash. We conducted a randomized-controlled experiment, through a survey administered to 467 blood donors in an Italian town, and found that donors are not reluctant to receive compensation in general; a substantial share of respondents declared that they would stop being donors if given 10. Euros in cash, but we do not find such effects when a voucher of the same nominal value is offered instead. The aversion to direct cash payments is particularly marked among women, but does not emerge among individuals who have only recently become donors. All of our findings are robust to regression analyses. Implications for research and public policy are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)738-748
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Altruism
  • Motivation and emotion
  • Public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do all material incentives for pro-social activities backfire? The response to cash and non-cash incentives for blood donations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this