Digital Scarlet Letters: Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Electronic Medical Record

Sarah Bennett, Denis R. Newman-Griffis, Mary Catherine Beach, Marielle Gross

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The harms of implicit bias in clinical settings are acknowledged but poorly understood and difficult to overcome. We discuss how structural components of electronic medical record (EMR) user interfaces may contribute to sex and gender-based discrimination against patients via constant, duplicative presentation of stigmatizing sexually transmitted infection (STI) data irrespective of clinical significance. Via comparison with symbolism and representative quotes in Hawthorne's 1850 novel The Scarlet Letter, we propose a metaphor to examine how EMRs function as a platform for moral judgment, which may display an indelible "scarlet letter"for pregnant patients with STI history. We consider whether current depictions of STIs in EMRs are structurally unjust and may contribute to biased treatment by directing attention to violations of hegemonic sex/gender norms regarding sexual behavior and thus triggering moral judgments of maternal fitness. We conclude with recommendations for how to address these challenges to improve ethical stewardship of sensitive sexual/reproductive health data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E70-E74
JournalSexually transmitted diseases
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Dermatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital Scarlet Letters: Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Electronic Medical Record'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this