TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences in the social networks of African American men who have sex with men only and those who have sex with men and women
AU - Latkin, Carl
AU - Yang, Cui
AU - Tobin, Karin
AU - Penniman, Typhanye
AU - Patterson, Jocelyn
AU - Spikes, Pilgrim
PY - 2011/10/1
Y1 - 2011/10/1
N2 - Objectives. We compared social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men only (MSMO) with social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men and women (MSMW). Methods. Study participants were 234 African American men who have sex with men who completed a baseline social network assessment for a pilot behavioral HIV prevention intervention in Baltimore, Maryland, from 2006 through 2009. We surveyed the men to elicit the characteristics of their social networks, and we used logistic regression models to assess differences in network characteristics. Results. MSMO were significantly more likely than were MSMW to be HIV positive (52% vs 31%). We found no differences between MSMO and MSMW in the size of kin networks or emotional and material support networks. MSMW had denser sexual networks, reported more concurrent and exchange partners, used condoms with more sexual partners, and reported interaction with a larger number of sexual partners at least once a week. Conclusions. Although there were many similarities in the social and sexual network characteristics of MSMO and MSMW, differences did exist. HIV prevention interventions should address the unique needs of African American MSMW.
AB - Objectives. We compared social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men only (MSMO) with social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men and women (MSMW). Methods. Study participants were 234 African American men who have sex with men who completed a baseline social network assessment for a pilot behavioral HIV prevention intervention in Baltimore, Maryland, from 2006 through 2009. We surveyed the men to elicit the characteristics of their social networks, and we used logistic regression models to assess differences in network characteristics. Results. MSMO were significantly more likely than were MSMW to be HIV positive (52% vs 31%). We found no differences between MSMO and MSMW in the size of kin networks or emotional and material support networks. MSMW had denser sexual networks, reported more concurrent and exchange partners, used condoms with more sexual partners, and reported interaction with a larger number of sexual partners at least once a week. Conclusions. Although there were many similarities in the social and sexual network characteristics of MSMO and MSMW, differences did exist. HIV prevention interventions should address the unique needs of African American MSMW.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053042274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053042274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300281
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300281
M3 - Article
C2 - 21852650
AN - SCOPUS:80053042274
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 101
SP - e18-e23
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 10
ER -