Differences in femoral morphology among the Orientals and Caucasians: a comparative study using plain radiographs

Najam Siddiqi, Antonio Valdevit, E. Y.S. Chao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the differences in femoral dimensions among Caucasian and Oriental populations. A total of 268 femora were collected from China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and the United States. Firstly, the dimensional parameters for measuring femur were identified. These were initially measured on bone specimens to determine the methodology, followed by measuring the same parameter on plane radiographs of the same bone specimen using a board, and digitized with the aim of verifying the repeatability and reliability of the data. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, paired students t test and Pearson’s correlation analysis. The results revealed that Caucasian femora are significantly larger in maximum bone length (BL), head-neck length (HNL), lesser trochanter width and the total width of the distal epiphysis (Wdf). The Beijing femora were found to be the longest and the Japanese femora constituted the shortest bone lengths and smallest angle alpha among the Oriental populations. A strong correlation was observed between Wdf and HD, HNL, Wmc and Wlc in all the populations; however, correlation between Wdf and BL was mild. The angle alpha showed no correlation with BL. This study generated a large database of femoral geometry, which may help pharmaceutical companies to design orthopedic implants for Oriental populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-66
Number of pages9
JournalAnatomical science international
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 25 2019

Keywords

  • Caucasians
  • Dimensional parameters
  • Femora
  • Orientals
  • Radiograph

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in femoral morphology among the Orientals and Caucasians: a comparative study using plain radiographs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this