TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic Error of Neuro-ophthalmologic Conditions
T2 - State of the Science
AU - Stunkel, Leanne
AU - Newman-Toker, David E.
AU - Newman, Nancy J.
AU - Biousse, Valérie
N1 - Funding Information:
V. Biousse and N. J. Newman are supported in part by NIH/NEI core grant P30-EY06360 (Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine) and by NIH/NINDS (RO1NSO89694). D. E. Newman-Toker's effort is supported by the Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Background:Diagnostic error is prevalent and costly, occurring in up to 15% of US medical encounters and affecting up to 5% of the US population. One-third of malpractice payments are related to diagnostic error. A complex and specialized diagnostic process makes neuro-ophthalmologic conditions particularly vulnerable to diagnostic error.Evidence Acquisition:English-language literature on diagnostic errors in neuro-ophthalmology and neurology was identified through electronic search of PubMed and Google Scholar and hand search.Results:Studies investigating diagnostic error of neuro-ophthalmologic conditions have revealed misdiagnosis rates as high as 60%-70% before evaluation by a neuro-ophthalmology specialist, resulting in unnecessary tests and treatments. Correct performance and interpretation of the physical examination, appropriate ordering and interpretation of neuroimaging tests, and generation of a differential diagnosis were identified as pitfalls in the diagnostic process. Most studies did not directly assess patient harms or financial costs of diagnostic error.Conclusions:As an emerging field, diagnostic error in neuro-ophthalmology offers rich opportunities for further research and improvement of quality of care.
AB - Background:Diagnostic error is prevalent and costly, occurring in up to 15% of US medical encounters and affecting up to 5% of the US population. One-third of malpractice payments are related to diagnostic error. A complex and specialized diagnostic process makes neuro-ophthalmologic conditions particularly vulnerable to diagnostic error.Evidence Acquisition:English-language literature on diagnostic errors in neuro-ophthalmology and neurology was identified through electronic search of PubMed and Google Scholar and hand search.Results:Studies investigating diagnostic error of neuro-ophthalmologic conditions have revealed misdiagnosis rates as high as 60%-70% before evaluation by a neuro-ophthalmology specialist, resulting in unnecessary tests and treatments. Correct performance and interpretation of the physical examination, appropriate ordering and interpretation of neuroimaging tests, and generation of a differential diagnosis were identified as pitfalls in the diagnostic process. Most studies did not directly assess patient harms or financial costs of diagnostic error.Conclusions:As an emerging field, diagnostic error in neuro-ophthalmology offers rich opportunities for further research and improvement of quality of care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102153122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102153122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001031
DO - 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001031
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32826712
AN - SCOPUS:85102153122
SN - 1070-8022
VL - 41
SP - 98
EP - 113
JO - Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
JF - Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
IS - 1
ER -