Development of a novel rapid response event review process for quality improvement

Michael Osnard, Rebecca R. Meredith, Kara Grace Leventhal, Sonia P. Dalal, Timothy M. Niessen, Gigi Liu, Rebecca Engels, Cora Lehet, Michael R. Cox, Ashley Haas, Marissa Proffen, Maggie Chan, Benjamin E. Bodnar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Rapid response team (RRT) and code activation events occur relatively commonly in inpatient settings. RRT systems have been the subject of a significant amount of analysis, although this has been largely focused on the impact of RRT system implementation and RRT events on patient outcomes. There is reason to believe that the structured assessment of RRT and code events may be an effective way to identify opportunities for system improvement, although no standardised approach to event analysis is widely accepted. We developed and refined a protocolised system of RRT and code event review, focused on sustainable, timely and high value event analysis meant to inform ongoing improvement activities. Methods A group of clinicians with expertise in process and quality improvement created a protocolised analytic plan for rapid response event review, piloted and then iteratively optimised a systematic process which was applied to all subsequent cases to be reviewed. Results Hospitalist reviewers were recruited and trained in a methodical approach. Each reviewer performed a chart review to summarise RRT events, and collect specific variables for each case (coding). Coding was then reviewed for concordance, at monthly interdisciplinary group meetings and € Action Items' were identified and considered for implementation. In any 12-month period starting in 2021, approximately 12-15 distinct cases per month were reviewed and coded, offering ample opportunities to identify trends and patterns. Conclusion We have developed an innovative process for ongoing review of RRT-Code events. The review process is easy to implement and has allowed for the timely identification of high value improvement opportunities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere002664
JournalBMJ Open Quality
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 10 2024

Keywords

  • electronic health records
  • healthcare quality improvement
  • hospital medicine
  • patient safety
  • quality improvement methodologies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a novel rapid response event review process for quality improvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this