Development of a Consensus-Based Definition of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in Children

Aaron E. Kornblith, Newton Addo, Monica Plasencia, Ashkon Shaahinfar, Margaret Lin-Martore, Naina Sabbineni, Delia Gold, Lily Bellman, Ron Berant, Kelly R. Bergmann, Timothy E. Brenkert, Aaron Chen, Erika Constantine, J. Kate Deanehan, Almaz Dessie, Marsha Elkhunovich, Jason Fischer, Cynthia A. Gravel, Sig Kharasch, Charisse W. KwanSamuel H.F. Lam, Jeffrey T. Neal, Kathyrn H. Pade, Rachel Rempell, Allan E. Shefrin, Adam Sivitz, Peter J. Snelling, Mark O. Tessaro, William White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Importance: The wide variation in the accuracy and reliability of the Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and the extended FAST (E-FAST) for children after blunt abdominal trauma reflects user expertise. FAST and E-FAST that are performed by experts tend to be more complete, better quality, and more often clinically valuable. Objective: To develop definitions of a complete, high-quality, and accurate interpretation for the FAST and E-FAST in children with injury using an expert, consensus-based modified Delphi technique. Design, Setting, and Participants: This consensus-based qualitative study was conducted between May 1 to June 30, 2021. It used a scoping review and iterative Delphi technique and involved 2 rounds of online surveys and a live webinar to achieve consensus among a 26-member panel. This panel consisted of international experts in pediatric emergency point-of-care ultrasonography. Main Outcomes and Measures: Definitions of complete, high-quality, and accurate FAST and E-FAST studies for children after injury. Results: Of the 29 invited pediatric FAST experts, 26 (15 men [58%]) agreed to participate in the panel. All 26 panelists completed the 2 rounds of surveys, and 24 (92%) participated in the live and asynchronous online discussions. Consensus was reached on FAST and E-FAST study definitions, and the panelists rated these 5 anatomic views as important and appropriate for a complete FAST: right upper-quadrant abdominal view, left upper-quadrant abdominal view, suprapubic views (transverse and sagittal), and subxiphoid cardiac view. For E-FAST, the same FAST anatomic views with the addition of the lung or pneumothorax view were deemed appropriate and important. In addition, the panelists rated a total of 32 landmarks as important for assessing completeness. Similarly, the panelists rated 14 statements on quality and 20 statements on accurate interpretation as appropriate. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study generated definitions for complete FAST and E-FAST studies with high image quality and accurate interpretation in children with injury. These definitions are similar to those in adults with injury and may be used for future education, quality assurance, and research. Future research may focus on interpretation of trace volumes of abdominal free fluid and the use of serial FAST.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere222922
JournalJAMA Network Open
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 18 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a Consensus-Based Definition of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in Children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this