TY - JOUR
T1 - Designing a trial to evaluate potential treatments for apathy in dementia
T2 - The Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial (ADMET): The Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial (ADMET)
AU - Drye, Lea T.
AU - Scherer, Roberta W.
AU - Lanctôt, Krista L.
AU - Rosenberg, Paul B.
AU - Herrmann, Nathan
AU - Bachman, David
AU - Mintzer, Jacobo E.
PY - 2012/4/4
Y1 - 2012/4/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: Research on efficacious treatments for apathy in Alzheimer disease has been hindered by a lack of consensus diagnosis, difficulties in measurement, and studies with small sample sizes. METHODS: In designing the Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial (ADMET), a trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate for the treatment of apathy in Alzheimer disease, we encountered the following issues: defining and measuring apathy, distinguishing apathy and depression, determining an appropriate test treatment, selecting relevant secondary outcomes, recruiting participants, and deciding on a suitable method for treatment unmasking. ADMET is a 6-week randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial with two parallel treatment groups assigned in a 1:1 ratio with randomization stratified by clinical center. The recruitment goal is 60 randomized participants over 2 years. The primary outcomes are change in apathy severity as measured by the Apathy Evaluation Scale and the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change. CONCLUSION: The design decisions made for ADMET are important elements to be considered in trials assessing the safety and efficacy of medications for clinically significant apathy in Alzheimer disease.
AB - BACKGROUND: Research on efficacious treatments for apathy in Alzheimer disease has been hindered by a lack of consensus diagnosis, difficulties in measurement, and studies with small sample sizes. METHODS: In designing the Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial (ADMET), a trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate for the treatment of apathy in Alzheimer disease, we encountered the following issues: defining and measuring apathy, distinguishing apathy and depression, determining an appropriate test treatment, selecting relevant secondary outcomes, recruiting participants, and deciding on a suitable method for treatment unmasking. ADMET is a 6-week randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial with two parallel treatment groups assigned in a 1:1 ratio with randomization stratified by clinical center. The recruitment goal is 60 randomized participants over 2 years. The primary outcomes are change in apathy severity as measured by the Apathy Evaluation Scale and the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change. CONCLUSION: The design decisions made for ADMET are important elements to be considered in trials assessing the safety and efficacy of medications for clinically significant apathy in Alzheimer disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859343977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859343977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31824afba8
DO - 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31824afba8
M3 - Article
C2 - 23567407
SN - 1064-7481
JO - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
JF - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
ER -