TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining the Boundaries of Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology
AU - Cuviello, Andrea
AU - Raisanen, Jessica C.
AU - Donohue, Pamela K.
AU - Wiener, Lori
AU - Boss, Renee D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the support of the pediatric oncology providers who participated in their study. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This study was supported, in part, by the Intramural Program of the National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.
Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the support of the pediatric oncology providers who participated in their study. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This study was supported, in part, by the Intramural Program of the National Cancer Institute , Center for Cancer Research .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Context: Although palliative care (PC) continues to be integrated into pediatric oncological care, only a minority of patients with cancer receive a formal PC consult. Objectives: We sought to describe oncologists' current understanding of PC and how primary PC is provided for children with cancer. Methods: This mixed-methods study explored pediatric oncology providers' definitions of PC and self-reported PC practices through semistructured audiotaped interviews. Conventional content analysis was applied to interview transcripts. Results: Seventy-seven participants with diverse training backgrounds (30 attending physicians, 21 nurses, 18 fellows, five nurse practitioners, and two child life specialists) completed an interview. Approximately 75% provided a modern definition of PC (e.g., not limited to end-of-life care); all participants acknowledged primary PC skills as part of their daily clinical activities. However, participants expressed wide variation in the comfort and time spent performing primary PC tasks (i.e., symptom management, addressing mental health and psychosocial needs) and over half reported that patients' PC needs are not adequately met. In addition, some reported confusion about the benefits of PC consultation, despite acknowledging that PC needs to be better integrated into the care of pediatric oncology patients. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that although most pediatric oncologists accept a modern definition of PC in theory, how to integrate PC into pediatric oncology practice is less understood. Formalized training and standardization of practice surrounding identification of PC needs in patients who may require secondary or tertiary PC services may help to overcome current barriers for PC integration in pediatric oncology.
AB - Context: Although palliative care (PC) continues to be integrated into pediatric oncological care, only a minority of patients with cancer receive a formal PC consult. Objectives: We sought to describe oncologists' current understanding of PC and how primary PC is provided for children with cancer. Methods: This mixed-methods study explored pediatric oncology providers' definitions of PC and self-reported PC practices through semistructured audiotaped interviews. Conventional content analysis was applied to interview transcripts. Results: Seventy-seven participants with diverse training backgrounds (30 attending physicians, 21 nurses, 18 fellows, five nurse practitioners, and two child life specialists) completed an interview. Approximately 75% provided a modern definition of PC (e.g., not limited to end-of-life care); all participants acknowledged primary PC skills as part of their daily clinical activities. However, participants expressed wide variation in the comfort and time spent performing primary PC tasks (i.e., symptom management, addressing mental health and psychosocial needs) and over half reported that patients' PC needs are not adequately met. In addition, some reported confusion about the benefits of PC consultation, despite acknowledging that PC needs to be better integrated into the care of pediatric oncology patients. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that although most pediatric oncologists accept a modern definition of PC in theory, how to integrate PC into pediatric oncology practice is less understood. Formalized training and standardization of practice surrounding identification of PC needs in patients who may require secondary or tertiary PC services may help to overcome current barriers for PC integration in pediatric oncology.
KW - Palliative care
KW - pediatric oncology
KW - quality of life
KW - symptom management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077917661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077917661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.11.022
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.11.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 31838131
AN - SCOPUS:85077917661
SN - 0885-3924
VL - 59
SP - 1033-1042.e1
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
IS - 5
ER -