Dantrolene for cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage: A randomised double blind placebo-controlled safety trial

Susanne Muehlschlegel, Raphael Carandang, Wiley Hall, Nisha Kini, Saef Izzy, Bridget Garland, Cynthia Ouillette, Imramsjah M.J. Van Der Bom, Thomas F. Flood, Matthew J. Gounis, John P. Weaver, Bruce Barton, Ajay K. Wakhloo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Dantrolene is neuroprotective in animal models and may attenuate cerebral vasospasm (cVSP) in human aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). We evaluated safety, feasibility and tolerability of intravenous dantrolene (IV-D) in patients with aSAH. Methods: In this single-centre, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial, 31 patients with aSAH were randomised to IV-D 1.25 mg every 6 h for 7 days (n=16) or equiosmolar free water/5% mannitol (placebo; n=15). Primary safety end points were incidence of hyponatraemia (sNa≤132 mmol/L) and liver toxicity (proportion of patients alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase and AlkPhos >5x upper-limit-of-normal). Secondary end points included tolerability, systemic hypotension and intracranial hypertension. Efficacy was explored for clinical/radiological cVSP, delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI), and 3-month functional outcomes. Quantitative analyses of angiograms and daily transcranial Doppler (TCD) were performed. Results: Between IV-D versus placebo, no differences were observed in the primary outcomes (hyponatremia 44% vs 67% (p=0.29); liver toxicity 6% vs 0% (p=1.0)). Three patients in the IV-D versus two in the placebo group had severe adverse events possibly attributable to infusion and reached stop criteria: one IV-D patient developed liver toxicity; two patients in each group developed brain oedema requiring osmotherapy. The majority of adverse events were not related to infusion (17 vs 5 (RR 2.2; 95% CI 0.7 to 6.7; p=0.16) in IV-D vs placebo). No differences in any categorical cVSP outcomes, DCI, 3-month outcomes or quantitative angiogram and TCD analyses were seen in this small safety trial not powered to detect efficacy. Conclusions: In this small trial, IV-D after aSAH was feasible, tolerable and safe. Trial registration number: http://clinicaltrials.gov NCT01024972.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1029-1035
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Volume86
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dantrolene for cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage: A randomised double blind placebo-controlled safety trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this