TY - JOUR
T1 - Cytomegalovirus incidence between everolimus versus mycophenolate in de novo renal transplants
T2 - Pooled analysis of three clinical trials
AU - Brennan, D. C.
AU - Legendre, C.
AU - Patel, D.
AU - Mange, K.
AU - Wiland, A.
AU - McCague, K.
AU - Shihab, F. S.
PY - 2011/11
Y1 - 2011/11
N2 - Everolimus (EVR) in heart and renal transplant (RTx) recipients may be associated with a decreased incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV). A detailed analysis of the association between EVR versus mycophenolic acid (MPA) and CMV events has not been reported. CMVdata from2004 de novo RTx recipients fromthreerandomized, prospective, EVR studies A2309 (N=833), B201 (N = 588) and B251 (N = 583) were retrospectively analyzed to identify differences between two EVR dosing groups and MPA. EVR groups received 1.5 mg/day, or 3 mg/day with either standard (SD-CsA) or reduced dose cyclosporine (RD-CsA). Controls received MPA with SD-CsA. CMV prophylaxis was as per center practice. CMV incidence (infection/syndrome, disease, viremia) was captured per local center evaluations. Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that freedom from CMV viremia and infection/syndrome was significantly greater for EVR versus MPA for recipients without CMV prophylaxis. Among recipients who received prophylaxis, freedom from viremia was greater for EVR 3.0mg; freedom from infection/syndrome was greater for EVR 3.0 and 1.5 mg. Although freedom from organ involvement was numerically greater for EVR, it was not statistically significant. This analysis documents significant reductions in the incidence of CMV infection/syndrome and viremia in EVR-treated de novo RTx recipients, especially those who did not receive CMV prophylaxis versus MPA.
AB - Everolimus (EVR) in heart and renal transplant (RTx) recipients may be associated with a decreased incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV). A detailed analysis of the association between EVR versus mycophenolic acid (MPA) and CMV events has not been reported. CMVdata from2004 de novo RTx recipients fromthreerandomized, prospective, EVR studies A2309 (N=833), B201 (N = 588) and B251 (N = 583) were retrospectively analyzed to identify differences between two EVR dosing groups and MPA. EVR groups received 1.5 mg/day, or 3 mg/day with either standard (SD-CsA) or reduced dose cyclosporine (RD-CsA). Controls received MPA with SD-CsA. CMV prophylaxis was as per center practice. CMV incidence (infection/syndrome, disease, viremia) was captured per local center evaluations. Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that freedom from CMV viremia and infection/syndrome was significantly greater for EVR versus MPA for recipients without CMV prophylaxis. Among recipients who received prophylaxis, freedom from viremia was greater for EVR 3.0mg; freedom from infection/syndrome was greater for EVR 3.0 and 1.5 mg. Although freedom from organ involvement was numerically greater for EVR, it was not statistically significant. This analysis documents significant reductions in the incidence of CMV infection/syndrome and viremia in EVR-treated de novo RTx recipients, especially those who did not receive CMV prophylaxis versus MPA.
KW - Cytomegalovirus
KW - Everolimus
KW - Mycophenolic acid
KW - Renal transplantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857194014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857194014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03674.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03674.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 21812923
AN - SCOPUS:84857194014
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 11
SP - 2453
EP - 2462
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
IS - 11
ER -