Current Trends in the Management of the Upper Limb in Spinal Cord Injury

Rebecca Martin, Jennifer Silvestri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There are nearly 12,000 new cases of spinal cord injury each year. About half of those involve some part of the arm and hand, representing significant disability and dependence for those patients. Restoration of upper limb function remains a high priority in rehabilitation; however, treatment protocols are widely variable and poorly defined. Recent research efforts fall into three main categories: therapeutic interventions, surgical reconstruction, and robotic developments. Therapeutic interventions involving high repetitions of motor and sensory input are under investigation but have limited support in the literature. Patients with incomplete injuries have a better prognosis. Surgical reconstruction techniques are evolving from advances in treatment of brachial plexopathy. Although these hold great potential for return of function, they are also high-risk techniques for which complications and inconsistent results have been reported. Finally, robotic developments, including exoskeletons and implants, show great promise but still have practical constraints. Management of the upper limb remains a complicated problem and more research efforts should be devoted to defining strategies for intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-186
Number of pages9
JournalCurrent Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Keywords

  • Activity-based therapy
  • Rehabilitation
  • Robotics
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Surgical reconstruction
  • Tetraplegia
  • Upper limb

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current Trends in the Management of the Upper Limb in Spinal Cord Injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this