TY - JOUR
T1 - Current Status and Unanswered Questions for Food Allergy Treatments
AU - Rachid, Rima
AU - Keet, Corinne A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest: R. Rachid has received research support from and is on the scientific advisory board for Aimmune Therapeutics. C. A. Keet has received research support from the National Institutes of Health; and has a patent 9539334: “Oral dissolving thin films containing allergens and methods of making and use.”
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Although there is no FDA approved therapy for food allergy, over the past decades, several routes of immunotherapy have been investigated for food allergy. Thus far, these therapies have shown variable levels of efficacy at desensitizing to foods, with oral immunotherapy (OIT) far more successful than sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) or epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT). However, desensitization tends to be temporary, and safety remains a major concern with OIT. Moreover, although it seems logical that desensitization will result in fewer reactions, it is not clear whether OIT or other immunotherapies are associated with an overall lower or higher risk of reactions over the long term. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a known complication of OIT, and may also be a risk with SLIT and possibly EPIT, although it has not been reported in the relatively few patients treated thus far. Adjuvants such as omalizumab or probiotics may improve the safety and/or efficacy of immunotherapy for food allergy, but more research is needed. In the future, biomarkers may identify subsets of patients who are better candidates for specific treatments. As therapies become commercially available, patients and providers will need to consider whether the benefits justify the risks and burdens of these treatments.
AB - Although there is no FDA approved therapy for food allergy, over the past decades, several routes of immunotherapy have been investigated for food allergy. Thus far, these therapies have shown variable levels of efficacy at desensitizing to foods, with oral immunotherapy (OIT) far more successful than sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) or epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT). However, desensitization tends to be temporary, and safety remains a major concern with OIT. Moreover, although it seems logical that desensitization will result in fewer reactions, it is not clear whether OIT or other immunotherapies are associated with an overall lower or higher risk of reactions over the long term. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a known complication of OIT, and may also be a risk with SLIT and possibly EPIT, although it has not been reported in the relatively few patients treated thus far. Adjuvants such as omalizumab or probiotics may improve the safety and/or efficacy of immunotherapy for food allergy, but more research is needed. In the future, biomarkers may identify subsets of patients who are better candidates for specific treatments. As therapies become commercially available, patients and providers will need to consider whether the benefits justify the risks and burdens of these treatments.
KW - Cure
KW - Epicutaneous immunotherapy
KW - Food allergy treatment
KW - Oral immunotherapy
KW - Sublingual immunotherapy
KW - Sustained unresponsiveness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034840305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034840305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.10.023
DO - 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.10.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 29162426
AN - SCOPUS:85034840305
SN - 2213-2198
VL - 6
SP - 377
EP - 382
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
IS - 2
ER -