@article{bb6d9829222c40508bdc624576fe187d,
title = "Current state of women in academic surgical subspecialties: How a new metric in measuring academic productivity may change the equation",
author = "Fecher, \{Alison M.\} and Nakul Valsangkar and Bell, \{Teresa M.\} and Lisy, \{Megan E.\} and Rozycki, \{Grace S.\} and Koniaris, \{Leonidas G.\}",
note = "Funding Information: In the August 2016 issue of the Journal of the Am Coll Surg, our group reported the differences between male and female academic surgeons by faculty rank, academic output, and NIH funding rates using data of faculty from the 55 departments of surgery with the most National Institutes of Health funding.1 Overall, metrics from 4015 surgical faculty members were examined. The objectives of the study were to identify potential barriers that might be preventing the academic success of all surgical faculty members. Men comprised 76.9 per cent (3087) and females comprised 23.1 per cent (928) of the faculty we could identify. Male surgical faculty also comprised a greater fraction of older surgeons.",
year = "2018",
month = may,
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "746--748",
journal = "American Surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",
}