TY - JOUR
T1 - Cumulative sum analysis score and phacoemulsification competency learning curve
AU - Vedana, Gustavo
AU - Cardoso, Filipe G.
AU - Marcon, Alexandre S.
AU - Araújo, Licio E.K.
AU - Zanon, Matheus
AU - Birriel, Daniella C.
AU - Watte, Guilherme
AU - Jun, Albert S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, International Journal of Ophthalmology (c/o Editorial Office). All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/7/18
Y1 - 2017/7/18
N2 - ● AIM: To use the cumulative sum analysis score (CUSUM) to construct objectively the learning curve of phacoemulsification competency. ● METHODS: Three second-year residents and an experienced consultant were monitored for a series of 70 phacoemulsification cases each and had their series analysed by CUSUM regarding posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and best-corrected visual acuity. The acceptable rate for PCR was <5% (lower limit h) and the unacceptable rate was >10% (upper limit h). The acceptable rate for bestcorrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 was <10% (lower limit h) and the unacceptable rate was >20% (upper limit h). The area between lower limit h and upper limit h is called the decision interval. ● RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean age, sex or cataract grades between groups. The first trainee achieved PCR CUSUM competency at his 22nd case. His best-corrected visual acuity CUSUM was in the decision interval from his third case and stayed there until the end, never reaching competency. The second trainee achieved PCR CUSUM competency at his 39th case. He could reach best-corrected visual acuity CUSUM competency at his 22nd case. The third trainee achieved PCR CUSUM competency at his 41st case. He reached best corrected visual acuity CUSUM competency at his 14th case. ● CONCLUSION: The learning curve of competency in phacoemulsification is constructed by CUSUM and in average took 38 cases for each trainee to achieve it.
AB - ● AIM: To use the cumulative sum analysis score (CUSUM) to construct objectively the learning curve of phacoemulsification competency. ● METHODS: Three second-year residents and an experienced consultant were monitored for a series of 70 phacoemulsification cases each and had their series analysed by CUSUM regarding posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and best-corrected visual acuity. The acceptable rate for PCR was <5% (lower limit h) and the unacceptable rate was >10% (upper limit h). The acceptable rate for bestcorrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 was <10% (lower limit h) and the unacceptable rate was >20% (upper limit h). The area between lower limit h and upper limit h is called the decision interval. ● RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean age, sex or cataract grades between groups. The first trainee achieved PCR CUSUM competency at his 22nd case. His best-corrected visual acuity CUSUM was in the decision interval from his third case and stayed there until the end, never reaching competency. The second trainee achieved PCR CUSUM competency at his 39th case. He could reach best-corrected visual acuity CUSUM competency at his 22nd case. The third trainee achieved PCR CUSUM competency at his 41st case. He reached best corrected visual acuity CUSUM competency at his 14th case. ● CONCLUSION: The learning curve of competency in phacoemulsification is constructed by CUSUM and in average took 38 cases for each trainee to achieve it.
KW - Best corrected visual acuity
KW - Cataract surgery
KW - Cumulative sum analysis
KW - Phacoemulsification learning curve
KW - Posterior capsule rupture
KW - Score
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024094212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024094212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18240/ijo.2017.07.11
DO - 10.18240/ijo.2017.07.11
M3 - Article
C2 - 28730111
AN - SCOPUS:85024094212
SN - 1672-5123
VL - 10
SP - 1088
EP - 1093
JO - International Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - International Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 7
ER -