TY - JOUR
T1 - Cumulative network meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and actual prescriptions for postmenopausal osteoporosis
T2 - a meta-epidemiological study
AU - Kataoka, Yuki
AU - Luo, Yan
AU - Chaimani, Anna
AU - Onishi, Akira
AU - Kimachi, Miho
AU - Tsujimoto, Yasushi
AU - Murad, Mohammad Hassan
AU - Li, Tianjing
AU - Cipriani, Andrea
AU - Furukawa, Toshi A.
N1 - Funding Information:
TAF reports personal fees from Meiji, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, MSD and Pfizer and a grant from Mitsubishi-Tanabe, outside the submitted work; TAF has a patent 2018-177688 pending.
Funding Information:
The Japan Osteoporosis Foundation and the Lily Scientific Research Fund partly supported this study. The funders played no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Summary: We compared the cumulative network meta-analyses with the recommendations in postmenopausal osteoporosis practice guidelines and actual prescribing practices in the USA. There was no apparent discrepancy between guideline recommendations and drug prescribing rankings, with the exception of vitamin D and calcium, when we used cumulative NMAs as references. Purpose: To compare the results of cumulative network meta-analyses (NMAs) with the recommendations in postmenopausal osteoporosis practice guidelines and actual prescribing practices in the USA. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in July 2017. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s National Guideline Clearinghouse and associated society websites were searched to retrieve guidelines in June 2018. We used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to analyze prescription data from 1996 to 2015. Two independent investigators selected eligible RCTs. One investigator selected potential eligible guidelines, which were confirmed by another investigator. Two independent investigators extracted data from included RCTs. One investigator extracted recommendations from guidelines, which were confirmed by another investigator. (Registration: UMIN000031894) Results: We analyzed data from 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. We chose hip fracture as the primary outcome of cumulative NMAs. We included 51 trials, 17 guidelines, and 5099 postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from the MEPS. Bisphosphonate, including alendronate, and combination of vitamin D and calcium (vDCa) were consistently recommendable from an efficacy viewpoint in NMAs and recommended in guidelines. Alendronate was the most prescribed drug (more than 30% over the observation period); however, vDCa was seldom prescribed. The maximum proportion was 5.3% from 2011 to 2015. Conclusions: In postmenopausal osteoporosis, there was no apparent discrepancy between guideline recommendations and drug prescribing rankings, with the exception of vDCa, when we used cumulative NMAs as references.
AB - Summary: We compared the cumulative network meta-analyses with the recommendations in postmenopausal osteoporosis practice guidelines and actual prescribing practices in the USA. There was no apparent discrepancy between guideline recommendations and drug prescribing rankings, with the exception of vitamin D and calcium, when we used cumulative NMAs as references. Purpose: To compare the results of cumulative network meta-analyses (NMAs) with the recommendations in postmenopausal osteoporosis practice guidelines and actual prescribing practices in the USA. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in July 2017. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s National Guideline Clearinghouse and associated society websites were searched to retrieve guidelines in June 2018. We used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to analyze prescription data from 1996 to 2015. Two independent investigators selected eligible RCTs. One investigator selected potential eligible guidelines, which were confirmed by another investigator. Two independent investigators extracted data from included RCTs. One investigator extracted recommendations from guidelines, which were confirmed by another investigator. (Registration: UMIN000031894) Results: We analyzed data from 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. We chose hip fracture as the primary outcome of cumulative NMAs. We included 51 trials, 17 guidelines, and 5099 postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from the MEPS. Bisphosphonate, including alendronate, and combination of vitamin D and calcium (vDCa) were consistently recommendable from an efficacy viewpoint in NMAs and recommended in guidelines. Alendronate was the most prescribed drug (more than 30% over the observation period); however, vDCa was seldom prescribed. The maximum proportion was 5.3% from 2011 to 2015. Conclusions: In postmenopausal osteoporosis, there was no apparent discrepancy between guideline recommendations and drug prescribing rankings, with the exception of vDCa, when we used cumulative NMAs as references.
KW - Clinical practice guidelines
KW - Cumulative network meta-analyses
KW - Hip fracture
KW - Meta-epidemiological study
KW - Postmenopausal osteoporosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079739455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079739455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11657-020-0697-8
DO - 10.1007/s11657-020-0697-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32088774
AN - SCOPUS:85079739455
SN - 1862-3522
VL - 15
JO - Archives of Osteoporosis
JF - Archives of Osteoporosis
IS - 1
M1 - 21
ER -