TY - JOUR
T1 - CT-guided native medical renal biopsy
T2 - Cortical tangential versus non-tangential approaches - A comparison of efficacy and safety
AU - Liu, Bo
AU - O'Dell, Matthew
AU - Flores, Miguel
AU - Limback, Joseph
AU - Kendall, Melissa
AU - Pepe, Julie
AU - Burt, Jeremy R.
AU - Contreras, Francisco
AU - Lewis, Andrew R.
AU - Ward, Thomas J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 RSNA.
PY - 2017/4
Y1 - 2017/4
N2 - Purpose: To review a single-center experience with the cortical tangential approach during computed tomography (CT)- guided native medical renal biopsy and to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared with those of a non-cortical tangential approach. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study received institutional review board approval, with a waiver of the HIPAA requirement for informed consent. The number of cores, glomeruli, and complications were reviewed in 431 CT-guided medical renal biopsies performed between July 2007 and September 2015. A biopsy followed a cortical tangential approach if the needle path was parallel to the renal cortical surface, at a depth closer to the renal capsule than the renal pelvic fat. A sample was considered adequate if the biopsy yielded at least 10 glomeruli at light microscopy, one glomerulus at immunofluorescence microscopy, and one glomerulus at electron microscopy. The χ2 test, the t test, the Mann-Whitney test, and logistic regression modeling of sample adequacy were performed. Results: One hundred fifty-six (36%) of 431 biopsies were performed with the cortical tangential approach. More cores were obtained for the cortical tangential group (2.6 vs 2.4, P = .001); biopsy needle gauge was not significantly different (P = .076). More adequate samples were obtained in the cortical tangential group (66.7% vs 49.8%, P = .001), with more glomeruli (23 vs 16, P = .014). Results were significant after controlling for needle gauge and number of cores (P = .008). The cortical tangential group had fewer complications (1.9% vs 7.3%, P = .018). Conclusion: The cortical tangential approach, when applied to CT-guided native medical renal biopsies, results in higher rates of sample adequacy and lower rates of postprocedural complications.
AB - Purpose: To review a single-center experience with the cortical tangential approach during computed tomography (CT)- guided native medical renal biopsy and to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared with those of a non-cortical tangential approach. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study received institutional review board approval, with a waiver of the HIPAA requirement for informed consent. The number of cores, glomeruli, and complications were reviewed in 431 CT-guided medical renal biopsies performed between July 2007 and September 2015. A biopsy followed a cortical tangential approach if the needle path was parallel to the renal cortical surface, at a depth closer to the renal capsule than the renal pelvic fat. A sample was considered adequate if the biopsy yielded at least 10 glomeruli at light microscopy, one glomerulus at immunofluorescence microscopy, and one glomerulus at electron microscopy. The χ2 test, the t test, the Mann-Whitney test, and logistic regression modeling of sample adequacy were performed. Results: One hundred fifty-six (36%) of 431 biopsies were performed with the cortical tangential approach. More cores were obtained for the cortical tangential group (2.6 vs 2.4, P = .001); biopsy needle gauge was not significantly different (P = .076). More adequate samples were obtained in the cortical tangential group (66.7% vs 49.8%, P = .001), with more glomeruli (23 vs 16, P = .014). Results were significant after controlling for needle gauge and number of cores (P = .008). The cortical tangential group had fewer complications (1.9% vs 7.3%, P = .018). Conclusion: The cortical tangential approach, when applied to CT-guided native medical renal biopsies, results in higher rates of sample adequacy and lower rates of postprocedural complications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017130176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017130176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2016160912
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2016160912
M3 - Article
C2 - 27875104
AN - SCOPUS:85017130176
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 283
SP - 293
EP - 299
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 1
ER -