Crib-O-Gram vs. Auditory brain stem response for infant hearing screening

Hiroshi Shimizu; Roger J. Walters; David W. Kennedy; Marilee C. Allen; Ricka K. Markowitz; Frances R. Luebkert

doi:10.1288/00005537-198507000-00012

Crib-O-Gram vs. Auditory brain stem response for infant hearing screening

Hiroshi Shimizu, Roger J. Walters, David W. Kennedy, Marilee C. Allen, Ricka K. Markowitz, Frances R. Luebkert

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

As a part of the longitudinal evaluation of a cluster of neonatal hearing screening procedures in a single high risk population, Crib-O-Gram (COG) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) screening have been administered to 190 infants in the NICU. Multiple COG screening showed inconsistent results in 25% of the infants. The COG failure rate was 27.9% with 2 out of 3 pass criterion. In the two-intensity ABR screening (70 dB and 30 dB), 17.9% failed at 30 dB bilaterally and 30.0% failed unilaterally. The repeated ABR screening and behavioral observation audiometry at age 6 months indentified one infant with a significant hearing loss in 78 infants. Two thirds of the COG failures and a little more than half of the ABR failures had a problem mainly with the middle ear. Advantages and disadvantages of each procedure arc presented.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	806-810
Number of pages	5
Journal	Laryngoscope
Volume	95
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198507000-00012
State	Published - Jul 1985
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Otorhinolaryngology

Access to Document

10.1288/00005537-198507000-00012

Cite this

@article{b5576b572b954047be2327e308e687d9,

title = "Crib-O-Gram vs. Auditory brain stem response for infant hearing screening",

abstract = "As a part of the longitudinal evaluation of a cluster of neonatal hearing screening procedures in a single high risk population, Crib-O-Gram (COG) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) screening have been administered to 190 infants in the NICU. Multiple COG screening showed inconsistent results in 25% of the infants. The COG failure rate was 27.9% with 2 out of 3 pass criterion. In the two-intensity ABR screening (70 dB and 30 dB), 17.9% failed at 30 dB bilaterally and 30.0% failed unilaterally. The repeated ABR screening and behavioral observation audiometry at age 6 months indentified one infant with a significant hearing loss in 78 infants. Two thirds of the COG failures and a little more than half of the ABR failures had a problem mainly with the middle ear. Advantages and disadvantages of each procedure arc presented.",

author = "Hiroshi Shimizu and Walters, {Roger J.} and Kennedy, {David W.} and Allen, {Marilee C.} and Markowitz, {Ricka K.} and Luebkert, {Frances R.}",

year = "1985",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1288/00005537-198507000-00012",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "95",

pages = "806--810",

journal = "Laryngoscope",

issn = "0023-852X",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crib-O-Gram vs. Auditory brain stem response for infant hearing screening

AU - Shimizu, Hiroshi

AU - Walters, Roger J.

AU - Kennedy, David W.

AU - Allen, Marilee C.

AU - Markowitz, Ricka K.

AU - Luebkert, Frances R.

PY - 1985/7

Y1 - 1985/7

N2 - As a part of the longitudinal evaluation of a cluster of neonatal hearing screening procedures in a single high risk population, Crib-O-Gram (COG) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) screening have been administered to 190 infants in the NICU. Multiple COG screening showed inconsistent results in 25% of the infants. The COG failure rate was 27.9% with 2 out of 3 pass criterion. In the two-intensity ABR screening (70 dB and 30 dB), 17.9% failed at 30 dB bilaterally and 30.0% failed unilaterally. The repeated ABR screening and behavioral observation audiometry at age 6 months indentified one infant with a significant hearing loss in 78 infants. Two thirds of the COG failures and a little more than half of the ABR failures had a problem mainly with the middle ear. Advantages and disadvantages of each procedure arc presented.

AB - As a part of the longitudinal evaluation of a cluster of neonatal hearing screening procedures in a single high risk population, Crib-O-Gram (COG) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) screening have been administered to 190 infants in the NICU. Multiple COG screening showed inconsistent results in 25% of the infants. The COG failure rate was 27.9% with 2 out of 3 pass criterion. In the two-intensity ABR screening (70 dB and 30 dB), 17.9% failed at 30 dB bilaterally and 30.0% failed unilaterally. The repeated ABR screening and behavioral observation audiometry at age 6 months indentified one infant with a significant hearing loss in 78 infants. Two thirds of the COG failures and a little more than half of the ABR failures had a problem mainly with the middle ear. Advantages and disadvantages of each procedure arc presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021886131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021886131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1288/00005537-198507000-00012

DO - 10.1288/00005537-198507000-00012

M3 - Article

C2 - 4010420

AN - SCOPUS:0021886131

SN - 0023-852X

VL - 95

SP - 806

EP - 810

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

IS - 7

ER -

Crib-O-Gram vs. Auditory brain stem response for infant hearing screening

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this