Cranioplasty Outcomes from 500 Consecutive Neuroplastic Surgery Patients

Micah Belzberg, Kerry Ann Mitchell, Netanel Ben-Shalom, Anthony O. Asemota, Amir Y. Wolff, Gabriel F. Santiago, Tamir Shay, Judy Huang, Paul N. Manson, Henry Brem, Chad R. Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Cranioplasty is critical to cerebral protection and restoring intracranial physiology, yet this procedure is fraught with a high risk of complications. The field of neuroplastic surgery was created to improve skull and scalp reconstruction outcomes in adult neurosurgical patients, with the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary team approach could help decrease complications. Objective: To determine outcomes from a cohort of cranioplasty surgeries performed by a neuroplastic surgery team using a consistent surgical technique and approach. Methods: The authors reviewed 500 consecutive adult neuroplastic surgery cranioplasties that were performed between January 2012 and September 2020. Data were abstracted from a prospectively maintained database. Univariate analysis was performed to determine association between demographic, medical, and surgical factors and odds of revision surgery. Results: Patients were followed for an average of 24 months. Overall, there was a reoperation rate of 15.2% (n = 76), with the most frequent complications being infection (7.8%, n = 39), epidural hematoma (2.2%, n = 11), and wound dehiscence (1.8%, n = 9). New onset seizures occurred in 6 (1.2%) patients. Several variables were associated with increased odds of revision surgery, including lower body mass ratio, 2 or more cranial surgeries, presence of hydrocephalus shunts, scalp tissue defects, large-sized skull defect, and autologous bone flaps. importantly, implants with embedded neurotechnology were not associated with increased odds of reoperation. Conclusions: These results allow for comparison of multiple factors that impact risk of complications after cranioplasty and lay the foundation for development of a cranioplasty risk stratification scheme. Further research in neuroplastic surgery is warranted to examine how designated centers concentrating on adult neuro-cranial reconstruction and multidisciplinary collaboration may lead to improved cranioplasty outcomes and decreased risks of complications in neurosurgical patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1648-1654
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2022

Keywords

  • Complication
  • cranial
  • craniectomy
  • cranioplasty
  • implant
  • neuroplastic
  • outcome
  • reconstruction
  • surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cranioplasty Outcomes from 500 Consecutive Neuroplastic Surgery Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this