TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-utility of rapid polymerase chain reaction-based influenza testing for high-risk emergency department patients
AU - Dugas, Andrea Freyer
AU - Coleman, Sara
AU - Gaydos, Charlotte A.
AU - Rothman, Richard E.
AU - Frick, Kevin D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org ). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. This work was supported by Johns Hopkins Clinical Research Scholars ( 5KL2RR025006 ), Department of Homeland Security (PACER: National Center for Study of Preparedness and Response [ 2010-ST-061-PA0001 ]), and Middle Atlantic RCE Program ( NIAID/NIH 2 U54 AI057168 ).
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - Study objective: We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based rapid influenza testing and treatment for influenza in adult emergency department (ED) patients who are at high risk for or have evidence of influenza-related complications. Methods: We developed a cost-utility decision analysis model that assessed adult patients presenting to the ED with symptoms of an acute respiratory infection, who met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for recommended antiviral treatment. Analysis was performed from the societal perspective, with incremental comparisons of 4 influenza testing and treatment strategies: treat none, treat according to provider judgment, treat according to results of a PCR-based rapid diagnostic test, and treat all. Results: Treating no patients with antivirals was dominated by all other strategies that increased in both cost and benefit in the following order: treat according to provider judgment, treat according to results of a PCR-based rapid diagnostic test, and treat all. As influenza prevalence increases, treating all patients eventually dominated all other options. Conclusion: The economic benefit of incorporating use of rapid PCR-based influenza testing for ED patients at risk of developing influenza-related complications depends on influenza prevalence; treatment guided by physician diagnosis or rapid testing, and treatment of all patients is more effective and less costly than no treatment.
AB - Study objective: We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based rapid influenza testing and treatment for influenza in adult emergency department (ED) patients who are at high risk for or have evidence of influenza-related complications. Methods: We developed a cost-utility decision analysis model that assessed adult patients presenting to the ED with symptoms of an acute respiratory infection, who met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for recommended antiviral treatment. Analysis was performed from the societal perspective, with incremental comparisons of 4 influenza testing and treatment strategies: treat none, treat according to provider judgment, treat according to results of a PCR-based rapid diagnostic test, and treat all. Results: Treating no patients with antivirals was dominated by all other strategies that increased in both cost and benefit in the following order: treat according to provider judgment, treat according to results of a PCR-based rapid diagnostic test, and treat all. As influenza prevalence increases, treating all patients eventually dominated all other options. Conclusion: The economic benefit of incorporating use of rapid PCR-based influenza testing for ED patients at risk of developing influenza-related complications depends on influenza prevalence; treatment guided by physician diagnosis or rapid testing, and treatment of all patients is more effective and less costly than no treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880823804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880823804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.01.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 23522607
AN - SCOPUS:84880823804
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 62
SP - 80
EP - 88
JO - Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians
JF - Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians
IS - 1
ER -