TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost and Health Care Resource Utilization Differences After Spine Surgery for Bony Spine versus Primary Intradural Spine Tumors
AU - Elsamadicy, Aladine A.
AU - Koo, Andrew B.
AU - Reeves, Benjamin C.
AU - Freedman, Isaac G.
AU - Pennington, Zach
AU - David, Wyatt B.
AU - Ehresman, Jeff
AU - Hengartner, Astrid
AU - Laurans, Maxwell
AU - Kolb, Luis
AU - Shin, John H.
AU - Sciubba, Daniel M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to compare complication rates, length of stay (LOS), and hospital costs after spine surgery for bony spine tumors and intradural spinal neoplasms. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2017. All adult inpatients who underwent surgical intervention for a primary intradural spinal tumor or primary/metastatic bony spine tumor were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis/procedural coding systems. Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, complications, LOS, discharge disposition, and total cost of hospitalization were assessed. Backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of perioperative complication, extended LOS (≥75th percentile), and increased cost (≥75th percentile). Results: A total of 9855 adult patients were included in the study; 3850 (39.1%) were identified as having a primary intradural spinal tumor and 6005 (60.9%) had a primary or metastatic bony spine tumor. Those treated for bony tumors had more comorbidities (≥3, 67.8% vs. 29.2%) and more commonly experienced ≥1 complications (29.9% vs. 7.9%). Multivariate analyses also showed those in the bony spine cohort had a higher odds of experiencing ≥1 complications (odds ratio [OR], 4.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04–5.97; P < 0.001), extended LOS (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.75–3.38; P < 0.001), and increased cost (OR, 5.32; 95% CI, 3.67–7.71; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Relative to patients being treated for primary intradural tumors, those undergoing spine surgery for bony spine tumors experience significantly higher risk for perioperative complications, extended LOS, and increased cost of hospital admission. Further identification of patient and treatment characteristics that may optimize management of spine oncology may reduce adverse outcomes, improve patient care, and reduce health care resources.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to compare complication rates, length of stay (LOS), and hospital costs after spine surgery for bony spine tumors and intradural spinal neoplasms. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2017. All adult inpatients who underwent surgical intervention for a primary intradural spinal tumor or primary/metastatic bony spine tumor were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis/procedural coding systems. Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, complications, LOS, discharge disposition, and total cost of hospitalization were assessed. Backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of perioperative complication, extended LOS (≥75th percentile), and increased cost (≥75th percentile). Results: A total of 9855 adult patients were included in the study; 3850 (39.1%) were identified as having a primary intradural spinal tumor and 6005 (60.9%) had a primary or metastatic bony spine tumor. Those treated for bony tumors had more comorbidities (≥3, 67.8% vs. 29.2%) and more commonly experienced ≥1 complications (29.9% vs. 7.9%). Multivariate analyses also showed those in the bony spine cohort had a higher odds of experiencing ≥1 complications (odds ratio [OR], 4.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04–5.97; P < 0.001), extended LOS (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.75–3.38; P < 0.001), and increased cost (OR, 5.32; 95% CI, 3.67–7.71; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Relative to patients being treated for primary intradural tumors, those undergoing spine surgery for bony spine tumors experience significantly higher risk for perioperative complications, extended LOS, and increased cost of hospital admission. Further identification of patient and treatment characteristics that may optimize management of spine oncology may reduce adverse outcomes, improve patient care, and reduce health care resources.
KW - Bony spine tumor
KW - Health care utilization
KW - Primary intradural spine tumor
KW - Spine surgery
KW - Spine tumor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105318407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105318407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.015
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 33866030
AN - SCOPUS:85105318407
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 151
SP - e286-e298
JO - World neurosurgery
JF - World neurosurgery
ER -