TY - JOUR
T1 - Correlation of high body mass index with more advanced localized prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy is not reflected in PSA level and PSA density but is seen in PSA mass
AU - Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.
AU - Epstein, Jonathan I.
AU - Meier, Frederick A.
AU - Gupta, Nilesh S.
AU - Menon, Mani
AU - Diaz, Mireya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Clinical Pathology.
PY - 2015/8
Y1 - 2015/8
N2 - Objectives: Prostate cancer screening algorithms and preoperative nomograms do not include patients' body mass index (BMI). We evaluated outcomes at radical prostatectomy (RP) adjusted to BMI. Methods: Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, PSA mass, PSA density (PSAD), and RP findings were analyzed with respect to BMI in 4,926 men who underwent RP between 2005 and 2014. Results: In total, 1,001 (20.3%) men were normal weight, 2,547 (51.7%) were overweight, and 1,378 (28%) were obese. Median PSA levels (ng/mL) were normal weight, 5.0; overweight, 5.1; and obese, 5.2 (P = .094). Median PSA mass increased with increasing BMI: 15.9 vs 17.4 vs 19.4 μg (P < .001). Median PSAD was not significantly different: 0.11 vs 0.11 vs 0.11 ng/mL/g (P = .084). Median prostate weight increased with increasing BMI: 44 vs 45 vs 49 g (P < .001). Median prostatectomy tumor volume increased with increasing BMI: 3.9 vs 4.7 vs 5.9 cm3 (P < .001). Overweight and obese patients had a higher Gleason score and more locally advanced cancer (P < .001). Frequency of positive surgical margins increased with higher BMIs (P < .001). Frequency of lymph node metastasis did not differ significantly (P = .088). Conclusions: While BMI correlates with tumor volume, Gleason score, and extent of disease at RP, there is no routinely measured clinical parameter reflecting this. Only PSA mass highlights this correlation. Thus, BMI and potentially PSA mass should be taken into account in predictive algorithms pertaining to prostate cancer and its surgical treatment.
AB - Objectives: Prostate cancer screening algorithms and preoperative nomograms do not include patients' body mass index (BMI). We evaluated outcomes at radical prostatectomy (RP) adjusted to BMI. Methods: Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, PSA mass, PSA density (PSAD), and RP findings were analyzed with respect to BMI in 4,926 men who underwent RP between 2005 and 2014. Results: In total, 1,001 (20.3%) men were normal weight, 2,547 (51.7%) were overweight, and 1,378 (28%) were obese. Median PSA levels (ng/mL) were normal weight, 5.0; overweight, 5.1; and obese, 5.2 (P = .094). Median PSA mass increased with increasing BMI: 15.9 vs 17.4 vs 19.4 μg (P < .001). Median PSAD was not significantly different: 0.11 vs 0.11 vs 0.11 ng/mL/g (P = .084). Median prostate weight increased with increasing BMI: 44 vs 45 vs 49 g (P < .001). Median prostatectomy tumor volume increased with increasing BMI: 3.9 vs 4.7 vs 5.9 cm3 (P < .001). Overweight and obese patients had a higher Gleason score and more locally advanced cancer (P < .001). Frequency of positive surgical margins increased with higher BMIs (P < .001). Frequency of lymph node metastasis did not differ significantly (P = .088). Conclusions: While BMI correlates with tumor volume, Gleason score, and extent of disease at RP, there is no routinely measured clinical parameter reflecting this. Only PSA mass highlights this correlation. Thus, BMI and potentially PSA mass should be taken into account in predictive algorithms pertaining to prostate cancer and its surgical treatment.
KW - BMI
KW - PSA
KW - PSA mass
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Prostatectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942592906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942592906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1309/AJCPQL9MKQ6VDDWL
DO - 10.1309/AJCPQL9MKQ6VDDWL
M3 - Article
C2 - 26185312
AN - SCOPUS:84942592906
SN - 0002-9173
VL - 144
SP - 271
EP - 277
JO - American journal of clinical pathology
JF - American journal of clinical pathology
IS - 2
ER -